Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

SQLite migration reports the source event count after skipping rows

Aberta Para iniciantes
#7,298 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
2/5
Tempo estimado
1-3 horas
Facilidade para iniciantes
88/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Claramente especificada
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
python, sqlalchemy, sqlite
Domínio
databases

Direção de pesquisa

Comece com google/adk/sessions/migration/migrate_from_sqlalchemy_sqlite.py e compare seu comportamento de contagem com migrate_from_sqlalchemy_pickle.py. Execute tests/unittests/sessions/migration/test_migration.py::test_sqlite_migration_reports_only_migrated_events; considera-se concluído quando uma falha de conversão deixa no destino apenas as linhas convertidas com sucesso e o log de migração identifica corretamente os eventos migrados e ignorados.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

🔴 Required Information

Describe the Bug:
migrate_from_sqlalchemy_sqlite.migrate skips any event row whose to_event() raises, logs a per-row warning, and then reports Migrated {len(events)} events. — the number of rows in the source table, not the number inserted. The transaction is committed and the run ends with Migration completed successfully., so a migration that permanently dropped events reports the full count. The pickle migration in the same package already counts successful inserts (num_rows in migrate_from_sqlalchemy_pickle.py).

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Create a v0 SQLite database with one session and two event rows.
  2. Make one row unconvertible, e.g. by making StorageEvent.to_event() raise for it.
  3. Run python -m google.adk.sessions.migration.migrate_from_sqlalchemy_sqlite --source_db_url sqlite:///source.db --dest_db_path dest.db.
  4. Read the log.

Expected Behavior:
The summary counts the rows that were actually migrated, and the rows that were skipped are named, so the operator can tell the destination is incomplete before following the script's own "rename your database" instruction.

Observed Behavior:

WARNING ... Failed to migrate event event2: unreadable event payload
INFO    ... Migrated 2 events.
INFO    ... Migration completed successfully.

dest.db contains one event row (event1).

Environment Details:

  • ADK Library Version: main @ 044a1ec3
  • Desktop OS: macOS
  • Python Version: 3.14.5

Model Information:

  • Are you using LiteLLM: No
  • Which model is being used: N/A (offline migration script)

🟡 Optional Information

Regression:
The count has been the source row count since the script was added.

Logs:

INFO     ... Migrating events...
WARNING  ... Failed to migrate event event2: unreadable event payload
INFO     ... Migrated 2 events.
INFO     ... Migration completed successfully.

Additional Context:
I hit this while auditing the two migration scripts against each other. A regression test that builds a two-event source DB, fails one conversion, and asserts the log reports Migrated 1 events. fails on main today. I have a fix ready that counts successful inserts and adds one warning naming the skipped ids; happy to open the PR, or to keep it even smaller if you would rather only fix the count.

Minimal Reproduction Code:
The test in the PR (tests/unittests/sessions/migration/test_migration.py::test_sqlite_migration_reports_only_migrated_events) is self-contained: it builds the v0 database, patches to_event for one row, runs migrate(), and asserts both the destination contents and the log.

How often has this issue occurred?:

  • Always (100%) whenever a row fails to convert
Linguagem predominante
Python
Estrelas
21.6k
Forks
4k
Merge médio
12h 6min
PRs com merge (30d)
4

Preparar o ambiente

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de google/adk-python

Todas as issues de google/adk-python

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Python

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.