Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

[rig-decomposition-bench] Daily rig decomposition benchmark — 2026-10-20 — no result (task picker returned null)

Aberta
#684 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
2/5
Tempo estimado
1-3 horas
Facilidade para iniciantes
58/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
node.js, typescript
Domínio
devtools, testing

Direção de pesquisa

Start with the benchmark program in the issue body and the rig skill entry point at .github/skills/rig/rig.ts. Check how the task picker call handles a null result and whether the reported Node version requirement affects that path; the issue says Node 24 or later is required and the run used Node 22 by default. Done means identifying why the picker returned null and providing a repeatable fix or setup step so the benchmark can proceed.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

ai-agent automation

Result

The benchmark ran once and failed at step 1. The task picker returned null, so nothing else executed.

  • Task: none chosen
  • Timing: single-call n/a, decomposed n/a, decomposed status fail
  • Decomposition attempts: none, because the task picker failed
  • Grading: none
  • Single-call solution: none
  • Decomposed program source and solution: none

Captured stdout (bench_output.json):

{"status":"fail","reason":"task picker returned null","task":null,"attempts":[],"source":""}

Captured stderr (bench_stderr.txt) was empty. The process exited with code 0.

Setup notes

  • The first --typecheck failed with missing Node type definitions (node:child_process, process, Buffer and others). I ran npm install in .github/skills/rig to fetch the skill's dependencies, and the typecheck then passed. The skill does not ship its node_modules, so a fresh install needs this step.
  • The default node on PATH was v22.23.3, although the skill requires Node 24 or later. Node 24.22.0 was also installed. This may be why the picker returned null, but I did not investigate. The run was not repeated, as instructed.
Benchmark program (Step 1)
import { agent, workflow, s, repair, configureAgent, copilotEngine } from "rig";

configureAgent(copilotEngine());

const DEADLINE = Date.now() + 25 * 60_000;
const left = () => DEADLINE - Date.now();

type Run = { code: number | null; stdout: string; stderr: string; timedOut: boolean };

async function runCli(source: string, args: string[], timeoutMs: number): Promise<Run> {
  const { spawn } = await import("node:child_process");
  return new Promise<Run>((resolve) => {
    let stdout = "";
    let stderr = "";
    let timedOut = false;
    const child = spawn("node", ["rig.ts", ...args], { cwd: process.cwd(), stdio: ["pipe", "pipe", "pipe"] });
    const timer = setTimeout(() => { timedOut = true; child.kill("SIGKILL"); }, Math.max(1000, timeoutMs));
    child.stdout.on("data", (d: Buffer) => { stdout += d.toString(); });
    child.stderr.on("data", (d: Buffer) => { stderr += d.toString(); });
    child.on("error", (e: Error) => { clearTimeout(timer); resolve({ code: -1, stdout, stderr: stderr + String(e), timedOut }); });
    child.on("close", (code: number | null) => { clearTimeout(timer); resolve({ code, stdout, stderr, timedOut }); });
    child.stdin.on("error", () => {});
    child.stdin.end(source);
  });
}

const cap = (t: string, n = 6000) => (t.length > n ? t.slice(0, n) + "\n...[truncated]" : t);

// Agent role: pick a concrete, gradeable, complicated daily task suited to multi-agent decomposition.
const pickTask = agent({
  name: "pickTask",
  model: "small",
  maxTurns: 2,
  addons: [repair()],
  instructions:
    "Pick one concrete, complicated task a person or team might face in a single day that would naturally benefit from being split across sub-agents running different models: multi-source research and synthesis, a multi-file coding task with design/implementation/review phases, a structured report combining several independent analyses, or a multi-step data transformation pipeline. It must be self-contained (solvable from its description alone, no external files or live web access) and concrete enough to grade. Prefer variety across domains; choose a random domain. Return a title, domain, description, and 3-6 concrete checkable success criteria.",
  output: s.object({
    title: s.string,
    domain: s.string,
    description: s.string,
    criteria: s.array(s.string),
  }),
});

// Agent role: solve the entire task alone in a single turn.
const solveSingle = agent({
  name: "solveSingle",
  model: "medium",
  maxTurns: 1,
  instructions:
    "Solve the whole task yourself in one response, addressing every success criterion. No delegation, no tools. Return the complete solution.",
  output: s.string,
});

// Agent role: write a decomposed rig program for the task.
const writeProgram = agent({
  name: "writeProgram",
  model: "medium",
  maxTurns: 1,
  instructions:
    "You write rig TypeScript programs. Output ONLY the complete program source (no prose; a single ts code fence is allowed). Rules: import only from \"rig\"; split the given task across at least two agents, each with a `// Agent role: ...` comment above it, choosing model \"small\" for simple sub-steps and \"medium\" or \"large\" for harder ones; coordinate them so the final answer combines their outputs rather than one agent solving everything; the root takes no required input and is exported with `export default` and never invoked. A workflow() spec accepts only `meta`, an optional `input`, and `body`; it has no `output` or `execute` field, and the final { solution } object is simply what body returns. An agent() root instead declares `output: s.object({ solution: s.string })`. Use `output: s.string` for every agent whose result is source text or free-form solution; do not make agents re-emit large solutions in object wrappers. Required shape (abridged to one agent; you need at least two):\n\n" +
    "```ts\nimport { agent, workflow, s } from \"rig\";\n\n// Agent role: <role>\nconst analyze = agent({ model: \"small\", instructions: \"...\", output: s.string });\n\n// Workflow role: combines the agents' outputs into the final solution\nexport default workflow({\n  meta: { name: \"decomposed-solution\", description: \"...\" },\n  body: async ({ call }) => {\n    const analysis = await call(analyze, \"...\");\n    return { solution: analysis ?? \"\" };\n  },\n});\n```\n\nThe `call(agent, promptString)` form passes a string input; agents may use `call(worker, input, { label })`. Agent results may be null on failure; handle with `?? \"\"`.",
  output: s.string,
});

// Agent role: fix a failing rig program, or write one from scratch when no source exists.
const fixProgram = agent({
  name: "fixProgram",
  model: "medium",
  maxTurns: 1,
  instructions:
    "You fix rig TypeScript programs. Output ONLY the complete corrected program source (no prose; one ts code fence allowed). Fix precisely what the error names and preserve what already worked. Constraints: import only from \"rig\"; at least two agents each with `// Agent role: ...` comment, models small/medium/large; final answer combines their outputs; root takes no input and is `export default`ed, never invoked. workflow() accepts only meta, optional input, and body (no output/execute); body returns { solution }. Use `output: s.string` for free-form agents. Required shape (abridged to one agent):\n\n" +
    "```ts\nimport { agent, workflow, s } from \"rig\";\n\n// Agent role: <role>\nconst analyze = agent({ model: \"small\", instructions: \"...\", output: s.string });\n\n// Workflow role: combines the agents' outputs into the final solution\nexport default workflow({\n  meta: { name: \"decomposed-solution\", description: \"...\" },\n  body: async ({ call }) => {\n    const analysis = await call(analyze, \"...\");\n    return { solution: analysis ?? \"\" };\n  },\n});\n```",
  output: s.string,
});

// Agent role: grade both solutions on correctness and completeness.
const grade = agent({
  name: "grade",
  model: "large",
  maxTurns: 1,
  addons: [repair()],
  instructions:
    "Score each solution 0-10 on how completely and correctly it satisfies the success criteria. Judge only correctness and completeness of content, not length and not which approach produced it. Pick winner single-call, decomposed, or tie, and explain the comparison.",
  output: s.object({
    singleScore: s.number,
    decomposedScore: s.number,
    winner: s.enum("single-call", "decomposed", "tie"),
    rationale: s.string,
  }),
});

function stripFence(t: string): string {
  const m = t.match(/```(?:ts|typescript)?\s*\n([\s\S]*?)```/);
  return (m ? m[1] : t).trim();
}

type Attempt = {
  attempt: number;
  generation: string;
  typecheck: string;
  execute: string;
  error: string;
  note: string;
};

// Workflow role: pick a task, solve it two ways, run the generated program, and grade.
export default workflow({
  meta: { name: "decomposition-bench", description: "Single-call vs decomposed benchmark", phases: ["Pick", "Single", "Decompose", "Grade"] },
  body: async ({ call, phase, log }) => {
    phase("Pick");
    const task = await call(pickTask, "Pick the task now.", { label: "pick" });
    if (!task) {
      return { status: "fail", reason: "task picker returned null", task: null, attempts: [] as Attempt[], source: "" };
    }
    const taskText = `Title: ${task.title}\nDomain: ${task.domain}\nDescription: ${task.description}\nSuccess criteria:\n${task.criteria.map((c: string) => `- ${c}`).join("\n")}`;

    phase("Single");
    const t0 = Date.now();
    const single = (await call(solveSingle, taskText, { label: "single", timeout: Math.max(5000, Math.min(left(), 6 * 60_000)) })) ?? "";
    const singleMs = Date.now() - t0;

    phase("Decompose");
    const d0 = Date.now();
    const attempts: Attempt[] = [];
    let source = "";
    let decomposed = "";
    let status = "fail";
    let lastError = "";
    for (let n = 1; n <= 2; n++) {
      if (left() < 4 * 60_000) { log("insufficient budget for another attempt"); break; }
      const rec: Attempt = { attempt: n, generation: "", typecheck: "skipped", execute: "skipped", error: "", note: "" };
      attempts.push(rec);
      let out: string | null;
      const wt = Math.max(5000, Math.min(left() - 60_000, 6 * 60_000));
      if (n === 1) {
        out = await call(writeProgram, taskText, { label: "write", timeout: wt });
      } else if (source.trim()) {
        out = await call(fixProgram, `Task:\n${taskText}\n\nCurrent source:\n${source}\n\nExact captured error:\n${lastError}\n\nFix the program.`, { label: "fix", timeout: wt });
      } else {
        out = await call(fixProgram, `There is no source to fix: the previous attempt produced no program. Generate the complete program from scratch for this task.\n\nTask:\n${taskText}`, { label: "fix-scratch", timeout: wt });
      }
      const src = out ? stripFence(out) : "";
      if (!src.trim()) {
        rec.generation = "empty (null or whitespace-only)";
        rec.error = "source generation returned no usable source";
        lastError = rec.error;
        if (n === 1) rec.note = "second attempt asks the fixer to generate from scratch";
        continue;
      }
      rec.generation = `ok (${src.length} chars)`;
      source = src;
      if (left() < 60_000) { rec.error = "time budget exhausted before typecheck"; break; }
      const tc = await runCli(src, ["--typecheck"], Math.min(2 * 60_000, left()));
      if (tc.code !== 0) {
        rec.typecheck = tc.timedOut ? "timeout" : "fail";
        rec.error = cap(tc.stdout + tc.stderr);
        lastError = rec.error;
        if (n === 1) rec.note = "fixer given source and the typecheck error";
        continue;
      }
      rec.typecheck = "pass";
      if (left() < 30_000) { rec.error = "time budget exhausted before execute"; break; }
      const ex = await runCli(src, ["--server"], Math.min(5 * 60_000, left()));
      if (ex.code !== 0 || !ex.stdout.trim()) {
        rec.execute = ex.timedOut ? "timeout" : "fail";
        rec.error = cap(ex.stderr + (ex.stdout ? "\n[stdout]\n" + ex.stdout : "") || "no output");
        lastError = rec.error;
        if (n === 1) rec.note = "fixer given source and the execute error";
        continue;
      }
      rec.execute = "pass";
      try {
        const parsed = JSON.parse(ex.stdout);
        decomposed = typeof parsed === "string" ? parsed : typeof parsed?.solution === "string" ? parsed.solution : JSON.stringify(parsed);
      } catch {
        decomposed = ex.stdout.trim();
      }
      if (decomposed.trim()) status = "pass";
      else rec.error = "execution succeeded but solution was empty";
      break;
    }
    const decomposedMs = Date.now() - d0;

    phase("Grade");
    const placeholder = "[Decomposition produced no solution: all attempts failed or the time budget was exhausted.]";
    const graded = left() > 30_000
      ? await call(grade, `${taskText}\n\n=== SOLUTION A (single-call) ===\n${single || "[empty]"}\n\n=== SOLUTION B (decomposed) ===\n${decomposed.trim() ? decomposed : placeholder}`, { label: "grade", timeout: Math.min(4 * 60_000, left()) })
      : null;

    return { status, task, singleMs, decomposedMs, single, decomposed, attempts, source, grading: graded };
  },
});

Verdict: no winner. The run failed at task selection (the pickTask agent returned null even with repair() and maxTurns: 2), so neither approach was attempted or graded.

Generated by Daily Rig Decomposition Benchmark · copilot · auto · 33 AIC · ⌖ 0.638 AIC · ⊞ 10K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 27, 2026, 1:08 PM UTC
Linguagem predominante
TypeScript
Estrelas
14
Forks
0
Merge médio
9h 49min
PRs com merge (30d)
32

Preparar o ambiente

Este projeto não oferece contêiner de desenvolvimento, Dockerfile nem guia de contribuição, então a configuração fica por sua conta: comece pelo README e veja nosso guia da primeira contribuição para os passos gerais.

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de githubnext/rig

Todas as issues de githubnext/rig

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de TypeScript

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.