False Positive: BrokenCryptoAlgorithm.ql reports nearby string literals even when the cipher call itself stays on AES.
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 3/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-2 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 52/100
Direção de pesquisa
Comece por Security/CWE/CWE-327/BrokenCryptoAlgorithm.ql e inspecione como a consulta determina a transformação que chega a Cipher.getInstance(...). Reproduza os relatórios com NegCase1_Var5.java, NegCase3.java e NegCase4_Var5.java e, em seguida, verifique se as chamadas AES seguras não são mais reportadas, enquanto as transformações genuinamente inseguras continuam sendo detectadas.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Security/CWE/CWE-327/BrokenCryptoAlgorithm.ql - Checker description: This checker detects insecure cryptographic algorithms (e.g., DES, RC4, ECB mode) being used as the algorithm specification in cryptographic operations.
Description of the false positive
These samples all keep the actual cryptographic operation on a safe algorithm. What changes is that insecure-looking strings appear somewhere nearby, or an intermediate computation happens to mention part of an insecure transformation name.
That should not be enough to report Security/CWE/CWE-327/BrokenCryptoAlgorithm.ql. The rule should care about the transformation that reaches Cipher.getInstance(...), not unrelated literals in the same method.
Affected test cases
NegCase1_Var5.java
This case requests AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding. There is no insecure algorithm at the sink, so this should stay unreported.
// A program with no string literal matching the insecure cryptographic algorithm pattern should not be flagged as insecure crypto usage.
package scensct.var.neg;
public class NegCase1_Var5 {
// Variant 5: Lexical and idiomatic - different secure algorithm from same family
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
// Using another secure algorithm: AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding (still secure if used with proper IV)
// This tests that the checker only flags insecure ones, not all algorithms.
String secureAlg = "AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding";
javax.crypto.Cipher cipher = javax.crypto.Cipher.getInstance(secureAlg); // [REPORTED LINE]
System.out.println("Cipher created with: " + secureAlg);
}
}
NegCase3.java
This sample keeps an RC4-looking string around, but the cipher call still uses AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding. Reporting this would mean the query is matching on lexical proximity rather than the actual call argument.
// A string literal matching the insecure pattern and a cryptographic call exist, but the call uses a different secure algorithm string should not be flagged as insecure crypto usage.
package scensct.core.neg;
public class NegCase3 {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
String unusedLiteral = "RC4_NOT_USED"; // Changed value to avoid matching insecure pattern
String secureAlg = "AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding"; // Different secure algorithm
javax.crypto.Cipher cipher = javax.crypto.Cipher.getInstance(secureAlg); // Crypto call uses secure string // [REPORTED LINE]
System.out.println("Insecure literal unused: " + unusedLiteral);
}
}
NegCase4_Var5.java
Here the code derives "DES" from a string, but that value never becomes the transformation passed to Cipher.getInstance(...). The live sink still uses AES, so this is not a real broken-crypto finding.
// A string literal matching the insecure pattern flows along a path but does not reach the algorithm parameter of a cryptographic operation should not be flagged as insecure crypto usage.
package scensct.var.neg;
public class NegCase4_Var5 {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
String alg = "DES/ECB/PKCS5Padding";
String extracted = null;
try {
extracted = alg.toUpperCase().substring(0, 3);
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
// ignore, won't happen
}
javax.crypto.Cipher cipher = javax.crypto.Cipher.getInstance("AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding"); // [REPORTED LINE]
System.out.println("Extracted: " + extracted);
}
}
Cause analysis
The common failure mode is that the query seems to treat suspicious string constants as if they were equivalent to the transformation that reaches the crypto API. That is too loose for Security/CWE/CWE-327/BrokenCryptoAlgorithm.ql.
In all three samples, the value at Cipher.getInstance(...) is still a safe AES transformation. The reported issue only appears if the query keeps too much context from nearby literals or partial string computations instead of following the exact argument that reaches the sink.
- Linguagem predominante
- CodeQL
- Estrelas
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge médio
- 2d 16h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 143
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de github/codeql
-
agentic-workflows
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
-
false-positive
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
Todas as issues de github/codeql
Issues semelhantes
-
enhancement
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 comentário ·
-
enhancement
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 75/100
palladius/rails8-app-on-gcp#142 ·
-
addition to tracking list Aberta
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 75/100
corsairdev/corsair#1764 ·
-
oblt-aw/detector/security
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100