feat(nip-01): send the rate-limited backoff hint on CLOSED (the half of nostr-protocol/nips#2498 the relay does not send)
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 5/5
- Tempo estimado
- Mais de uma semana
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- typescript
Direção de pesquisa
Start with src/utils/messages.ts and src/@types/messages.ts for the existing OK and CLOSED patterns, then compare the read gates in src/adapters/web-socket-adapter.ts and src/handlers/subscribe-message-handler.ts. Decide which gate should emit the hint, since the issue describes two options and neither currently sends CLOSED for rate limiting. Add the constructor and wire-frame tests described in the issue, including the relay probe check; done means a rate-limited CLOSED carries the optional milliseconds parameter and existing behavior remains covered.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
feat(nip-01): send the rate-limited backoff hint on CLOSED
nostr-protocol/nips#2498 ("Add an extra parameter to the CLOSED and OK messages") appends an optional trailing parameter to both messages:
["OK", <event_id>, <true|false>, <message>, <?params>]["CLOSED", <subscription_id>, <message>, <?params>]
rate-limited is the one pair the PR standardizes: a zero-free decimal string of a positive integer in milliseconds, read as "back off this long before sending the relay the same message type that tripped the limit". It MAY be approximate, and its absence MUST NOT be read as an instruction to retry immediately. The text's own example for this side: ["CLOSED", "sub1...", "rate-limited: slow down there chief", "2500"].
Half of it shipped; this is the other half
PR #807 implemented the OK side and shipped it in 3.3.0 — createCommandResult (src/utils/messages.ts:32) now takes params?: string, and the hint is Math.max(1, Math.ceil(period)) ms of the first rate-limit window that tripped. It closed #805 with its own body stating the boundary: "CLOSED is untouched, since nostream never sends rate-limited on it."
That statement is still true on main (4cf419f), and so is the plumbing gap:
createClosedMessage(src/utils/messages.ts:43) builds a fixed[CLOSED, queryId, reason].ClosedMessage(src/@types/messages.ts:89-93) declares0,1,2and no optional3.
Can nostream support it? The message is a one-parameter change; the message source is the gap
Adding the parameter is the same shape #807 already did for OK — one optional argument on a shared helper and its type. What does not exist is any site that would emit it, because nothing that gates a read answers with a CLOSED today. Verified on main 4cf419f:
| where a read is gated | what the client gets today | file:line |
|---|---|---|
per-IP raw-message limiter (also covers REQ) |
["NOTICE", "rate limited"], message dropped |
src/adapters/web-socket-adapter.ts:203-204 |
REQ refused (duplicate, too many, limits) |
NOTICE "Subscription rejected: ..." |
src/handlers/subscribe-message-handler.ts:59 |
| NIP-42 restricted read | CLOSED "auth-required: ..." — not rate-limit-keyed |
src/handlers/subscribe-message-handler.ts:68 |
| connection limiter | socket terminated, no protocol message | src/adapters/web-socket-server-adapter.ts |
| stream end / truncation | EOSE |
src/handlers/subscribe-message-handler.ts:208,237 |
So the parameter has nowhere to attach, and the NIP's wording makes this a design call rather than plumbing: the value means "back off the same message type that tripped it", while nostream's read-side throttle is message-type-agnostic and sits above the handler (the event.rateLimits limiter from #807 is write-only — REQ/COUNT never touch it).
Two honest options:
- Speak
CLOSEDfrom the existing read-side throttle when the message is aREQ—src/adapters/web-socket-adapter.ts:203-204has the subscription id in hand asmessage[1]before dispatch. Cheapest, but it changes a frame every client already sees, and the limiter would need a per-message-type prefix. - Add a
REQ-scoped limiter in the subscribe handler, beside the existing authCLOSEDatsrc/handlers/subscribe-message-handler.ts:68, so the value means what the NIP says it means: this subscription class, this window.
Either way, the emission site is roughly five lines next to a precedent that already exists, plus the helper/type change.
Related, and worth separating
The argument for the parameter in the PR thread (jb55, from the strfry side) is that the hint only helps if the cut-off is visible: a relay that stops delivering a REQ's stored events early should end with CLOSED "rate-limited: ..." and MUST NOT send EOSE, because a client that received some EVENTs and then EOSE cannot tell a short result from a complete one. Nostream's stream ends at EOSE (src/handlers/subscribe-message-handler.ts:208,237). That is a different behaviour from the parameter and deserves its own issue if it is wanted — it is flagged here only because it is the case that makes the CLOSED parameter worth having.
Testing
- Constructor: 3-element output when no hint, 4-element when present (the
OKtests from #807 are the model). - Whichever site is chosen: a case asserting the wire frame, including that a client reading only
[0..2]is unaffected. src/utils/relay-probe/ws-protocol-probe.ts:253readsresponse[2]of aCLOSED— trailing elements must not confuse it.
Effort
Small and self-contained: one optional parameter through createClosedMessage/ClosedMessage, and one emission at a read gate. The work is deciding which gate, since none of them speaks CLOSED today.
- Linguagem predominante
- TypeScript
- Estrelas
- 829
- Forks
- 234
- Merge médio
- 2d 10h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 24
Preparar o ambiente
- Inclui um Dockerfile ou arquivo Docker Compose
- Tem um modelo de pull request
- Ler o guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de cameri/nostream
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
feat(nip77): advertise NIP-77 in NIP-11 and expose its settings in the admin consoleTalvez já em andamento @Priyanshubhartistm assumiu hoje. Abertaenhancement
cameri/nostream#819 · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
feat(nip77): NEG-OPEN/NEG-MSG/NEG-CLOSE wire protocol for the PostgreSQL backendTalvez já em andamento @Priyanshubhartistm assumiu hoje. Abertaenhancement
cameri/nostream#817 · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
[Admin Console] Ops visibility panels (mirror, workers, NIP-05, storage)Talvez já em andamento @Ferryx349 assumiu há 1 dia. AbertaAdmin Console enhancement
cameri/nostream#816 · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
feat(admin): bounded NIP-66 probe history and Network Health timelineTalvez já em andamento @Ferryx349 assumiu há 5 dias. AbertaAdmin Console enhancement
cameri/nostream#800 · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Todas as issues de cameri/nostream
Issues semelhantes
-
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 85/100
-
area:cowork area:desktop documentation enhancement platform:macos
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 68/100
anthropics/claude-code#101720 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 77/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#6610 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 3 dias
-
Add: MS NOWAbertacheck:passed streams:add
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 65/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Global update drops overrideAccess, so Local API updateGlobal fails filterOptions validation (3.90 regression)Talvez já em andamento @PINYOPATTANAWASANPORN assumiu hoje. Abertaarea: core Bug
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 76/100
payloadcms/payload#18674 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia