[Bug][dora] calculateChangeLeadTime loads the whole commits_diffs deployment join into memory
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
@mdelacruz-avantio já está trabalhando nisso.
Desde 29/10/2026.
- #9281 de @mdelacruz-avantio — aberto
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 3/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-2 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Clareza
- Claramente especificada
- Status de atividade
- Estagnada
- Stack de tecnologia
- go
- Domínio
- backend, data-engineering
Direção de pesquisa
Start with batchFetchDeployments in backend/plugins/dora/tasks/change_lead_time_calculator.go and inspect how the second phase joins cicd_deployment_commits with commits_diffs. The issue proposes streaming rows into a three-column struct while preserving the joins, filters, ordering, and first-wins tie-break; an open pull request already tracks this work. Done means memory scales with distinct merge commits and the tie-break has an end-to-end test.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Search before asking
- I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.
What happened
batchFetchDeployments in backend/plugins/dora/tasks/change_lead_time_calculator.go resolves merge commits to deployments in two phases. The second phase joins cicd_deployment_commits with commits_diffs, loads every joined row into a slice of full CicdDeploymentCommit structs with db.All, and only then keeps the first row per merge commit in Go.
Memory therefore grows with the size of the join, not with the number of merge commits. The join has one row per commit between a production deployment and its previous successful one, for every merge commit in that range. On a project where deployments are far apart in commit history, or where a deployment job records a commit from a second repository with a long history, the join becomes very large.
On our instance the query returns about 936,000 rows for 14,088 distinct merge commits (1,693 production deployment commits). The lake container peaks at about 1.7 GiB in this subtask, is OOMKilled at a 2 GiB limit on every nightly run, and then crash loops because each restart resumes the same pipeline at the same subtask. The row count grows every week.
What do you expect to happen
The memory used by this subtask stays proportional to the number of distinct merge commits, as the first phase already does, whatever the size of the commits_diffs join.
How to reproduce
- A project with a few hundred production deployment commits where consecutive deployments are thousands of commits apart, so
commits_diffsholds many rows per deployment pair. - Run the DORA pipeline and watch the lake container memory during
calculateChangeLeadTime, or count the rows the second phase loads:
SELECT COUNT(*), COUNT(DISTINCT cd.commit_sha)
FROM cicd_deployment_commits dc
LEFT JOIN cicd_deployment_commits p ON dc.prev_success_deployment_commit_id = p.id
INNER JOIN commits_diffs cd ON cd.new_commit_sha = dc.commit_sha AND cd.old_commit_sha = COALESCE(p.commit_sha, '')
LEFT JOIN project_mapping pm ON pm.table = 'cicd_scopes' AND pm.row_id = dc.cicd_scope_id
WHERE dc.prev_success_deployment_commit_id <> '' AND dc.environment = 'PRODUCTION' AND dc.result = 'SUCCESS' AND pm.project_name = '<project>';
The first number is what the subtask materialises, the second is what it keeps.
Anything else
Streaming the second phase with db.Cursor and db.Fetch into a three-column struct and keeping the first row per merge commit, with the same joins, filters and ordering, makes the memory independent of the join size. I will open a pull request with that change and an e2e case for the first-wins tie-break.
Raising the container memory limit and setting GOMEMLIMIT is a stopgap only, the peak keeps growing with the join.
Version
v1.0.3-beta18. The function is unchanged on main at 625e512a4.
- Linguagem predominante
- Go
- Estrelas
- 3.2k
- Forks
- 830
- Merge médio
- 2d 12h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 61
Preparar o ambiente
Inicia o contêiner de desenvolvimento do projeto no navegador, com a sua própria conta do GitHub.
- Sem Dockerfile nem arquivo Docker Compose
- Tem um modelo de pull request
- Sem guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de apache/devlake
-
type/bug
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 60/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
type/bug
Dificuldade 3/5 Meio dia Facilidade para iniciantes 73/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
[Refactor][Build] Build the core and all plugins into a single binary by defaultTalvez já em andamento @klesh assumiu há 1 dia. Abertacomponent/plugins type/refactor
Dificuldade 5/5 Mais de uma semana Facilidade para iniciantes 25/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
[Feature][Plugin] Add a GLPI data source pluginTalvez já em andamento @rabelenda assumiu há 2 dias. Abertatype/feature-request
Dificuldade 5/5 Mais de uma semana Facilidade para iniciantes 38/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
Todas as issues de apache/devlake
Issues semelhantes
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 85/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
schema-drift
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
stefanhoth/paperless-ngx-cli#61 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Project submission: CodeAFAberta
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents#888 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
enhancement nav-pilot
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
kind/enhancement
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 64/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia