Chat: add model-aware history budgets and safe compaction for replay/recovery

Aberta
  • Algo errado?
#430 1 comentário 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
5/5
Tempo estimado
Mais de uma semana
Facilidade para iniciantes
12/100
Tipo de issue
Funcionalidade
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
go
Domínio
ai-infra-agents

Direção de pesquisa

This is design work spanning chat prompt construction, transcript persistence, branch/edit invalidation and native-session recovery, and the payload names no specific files or tests. Start by locating where the chat prompt and history are assembled for the selected model, and read the related transport fix in #429. Done would need a settled budget/compaction design and the listed acceptance tests (oversized draft, pending confirmations, branch invalidation, missing native transcript, multibyte UTF-8) passing against a fixture provider.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

Related transport fix: #429.

Moving a chat prompt from argv to stdin avoids the operating system's per-argument limit, but does not enforce the selected model's context window. Long authoritative transcripts, including saved operation drafts, can still grow indefinitely. Branches, edited histories, executor changes and missing native sessions require full-history reconstruction, which may exceed the model budget even when normal incremental continuation works.

Please consider a separate context-management change:

  • Define provider/model-aware input budgets with room for system instructions, tool schemas and expected output. Track serialized UTF-8 bytes separately from estimated/model token counts; do not treat a 128 KiB OS argument threshold as a model context limit.
  • Build a bounded model-facing projection while preserving the authoritative user-visible transcript. Summaries should retain user constraints, pending approvals and operation receipts, and must not turn historical instructions into current authorization.
  • Use a persisted, revision-bound summary/checkpoint plus recent turns; invalidate it correctly when editing or branching. Keep the current question intact and expose a clear diagnostic when even the current turn cannot fit.
  • Ensure initial chat, long-history branches and native-session recovery use the same budget/compaction policy. Coordinate with provider-native compaction instead of replaying unbounded history after a cache miss.
  • Return structured, redacted failure codes for input budget/context overflow, distinct from process-launch E2BIG, provider quota failures and malformed tool JSON. Log byte/token counts and correlation IDs rather than complete prompts or credentials.

Acceptance tests should cover an oversized historical draft, preservation of pending confirmations, edited/branched history invalidation, missing native transcript recovery, and multibyte UTF-8 budgeting. These tests should use synthetic transcripts and a local fixture provider.

No deployment-specific transcripts, addresses or credentials are needed to reproduce or test this behavior.

Linguagem predominante
Go
Estrelas
141
Forks
28
Merge médio
1d 15h
PRs com merge (30d)
113

Preparar o ambiente

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de Tencent/LoopForge

Todas as issues de Tencent/LoopForge

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Go

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.