nvcc with MSVC as host compiler (Windows) can't compile stdexec: compiler detection takes the nvcc branch and skips the MSVC settings
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 4/5
- Tempo estimado
- 3-5 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 18/100
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Domínio
- build-system, devtools
Direção de pesquisa
The detection logic is in include/stdexec/__detail/__config.hpp, where the NVCC branch runs before the MSVC checks, so STDEXEC_MSVC() and STDEXEC_MSVC_HEADERS() are never set under nvcc with an MSVC host. Related spots are __spin_loop_pause.hpp, __meta.hpp (__mk_indices) and __connect.hpp (__connect_declfn_v). Done would mean the minimal nvcc_msvc.cu example compiles with nvcc on Windows, or the header fails early with a clear #error; the maintainers have not yet decided which, so confirm the direction first.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
With nvcc on Windows (MSVC as host compiler), even a minimal program fails to compile at current main (1d58877ad898fa3422658d47b28f67deb9c10e80). We ran into this while building HPX with CUDA on Windows.
Versions: CUDA 13.0 (nvcc V13.0.88), MSVC 19.44.35229 (VS 2022 17.14, x64), Windows 11. CUDA 13.0 doesn't accept MSVC 19.52 (VS 18) as host compiler.
// nvcc_msvc.cu
#include <stdexec/execution.hpp>
int main()
{
auto s = stdexec::just(41) | stdexec::then([](int i) { return i + 1; });
auto [v] = stdexec::sync_wait(std::move(s)).value();
return v == 42 ? 0 : 1;
}
nvcc -std=c++20 -Xcompiler=-Zc:__cplusplus -Xcompiler=-Zc:preprocessor -Xcompiler=/EHsc --extended-lambda --expt-relaxed-constexpr -arch=sm_89 -I stdexec/include nvcc_msvc.cu
(-Zc:__cplusplus and -Zc:preprocessor are needed to get past the C++20 check and the preprocessor check in __config.hpp.)
Output (paths shortened, repeated lines removed):
include/stdexec/__detail/__meta.hpp(168): error: declaration is incompatible with variable template "stdexec::__pack::__mk_indices" (declared at line 163)
include/stdexec/__detail/__connect.hpp(83): error: declaration is incompatible with variable template "stdexec::__connect::__connect_declfn_v" (declared at line 77)
include/stdexec/__detail/__connect.hpp(90): error: declaration is incompatible with variable template "stdexec::__connect::__connect_declfn_v" (declared at line 77)
include/stdexec/__detail/__connect.hpp(103): error: declaration is incompatible with variable template "stdexec::__connect::__connect_declfn_v" (declared at line 97)
include/stdexec/__detail/__connect.hpp(110): error: declaration is incompatible with variable template "stdexec::__connect::__connect_declfn_v" (declared at line 97)
include/stdexec/__detail/__spin_loop_pause.hpp(48): error: identifier "__builtin_ia32_pause" is undefined
include/stdexec/__detail/__transform_completion_signatures.hpp(360): error: type name is not allowed
include/stdexec/__detail/__transform_completion_signatures.hpp(360): error: too many initializer values
include/stdexec/__detail/__transform_completion_signatures.hpp(400): error: type name is not allowed
include/stdexec/__detail/__transform_completion_signatures.hpp(400): error: too many initializer values
include/stdexec/__detail/__sync_wait.hpp(353): error: no instance of function template "stdexec::connect_t::operator()" matches the argument list
include/stdexec/__detail/__sync_wait.hpp(355): error: static assertion failed with "..."
nvcc_msvc.cu(6): error: expression must have class type but it has type "void"
15 errors detected in the compilation of "nvcc_msvc.cu".
The cause seems to be the compiler detection in __config.hpp: the __NVCC__ branch comes first, so with an MSVC host neither STDEXEC_MSVC() nor STDEXEC_MSVC_HEADERS() is ever set, although _MSC_VER is defined and the MSVC standard library is used. As a result:
__spin_loop_pause()takes the GCC branch (__builtin_ia32_pause()) instead of_mm_pause()from<intrin.h>.__make_indicesfalls back to theexternvariable template partial specializations (__mk_indices), and__connect.hppuses the__connect_declfn_vspecializations instead of the function-based version it already has for MSVC. nvcc's front end in MSVC mode rejects both ("declaration is incompatible with variable template").- After the front end,
clcompiles nvcc's preprocessed output (.cudafe1.cpp). The macros were already expanded with__NVCC__defined, so the MSVC workarounds keyed onSTDEXEC_MSVC()are missing there too.
What we tried in a local copy of 04de75de58 (the revision HPX uses today, which fails with the same __mk_indices and __builtin_ia32_pause errors): setting STDEXEC_MSVC_HEADERS() to 1 in the nvcc branch when _MSC_VER is defined fixes the __builtin_ia32_pause error, and using std::make_index_sequence for __make_indices fixes the __mk_indices error. With HPX's CUDA test files, and with the MSVC __msplice_helper variant enabled for nvcc as well, the front end then gets through, but cl fails on the .cudafe1.cpp file: first an internal compiler error (C1001) at __typeinfo.hpp(289), then errors such as C7571 (enable_sender: variable template has already been initialized) at __execution_fwd.hpp(287) and C7608 (atomic constraint should be a constant expression) at __sender_concepts.hpp(131) and __sender_introspection.hpp(259). So it takes more than a few local fixes, and the MSVC code paths would have to apply to both nvcc's front end and the host compilation.
Is nvcc with an MSVC host meant to be supported? If yes, would a separate STDEXEC_NVCC_MSVC_HOST() (or setting STDEXEC_MSVC_HEADERS() and the MSVC workarounds whenever _MSC_VER is defined) be the direction you'd want? If not, it would help to say so in the README and to fail early with an #error, so users don't get errors from deep inside the library.
- Linguagem predominante
- C++
- Estrelas
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 285
- Merge médio
- 2d 5h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 81
Preparar o ambiente
Este projeto não oferece contêiner de desenvolvimento, Dockerfile nem guia de contribuição, então a configuração fica por sua conta: comece pelo README e veja nosso guia da primeira contribuição para os passos gerais.
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de NVIDIA/stdexec
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 68/100
NVIDIA/stdexec#1751 · 3 comentários ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 25/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Dificuldade 4/5 Mais de uma semana Facilidade para iniciantes 18/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Dificuldade 3/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 25/100
NVIDIA/stdexec#2400 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Dificuldade 5/5 Mais de uma semana Facilidade para iniciantes 12/100
NVIDIA/stdexec#2344 · 4 comentários ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
Todas as issues de NVIDIA/stdexec
Issues semelhantes
-
documentation
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
EchoTools/nevr-runtime#2042 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Download size and speed show scientific notation between 1000 and 1023 unitsTalvez já em andamento @RaphaelFakhri assumiu hoje. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
kiwix/kiwix-desktop#1570 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Device Request
Dificuldade 2/5 Meio dia Facilidade para iniciantes 62/100
dresden-elektronik/deconz-rest-plugin#8686 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
nixos/noctalia-greeter: greeter finds no sessions (session dirs not passed via XDG_DATA_DIRS)Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
aminya/project_options#303 ·