Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

the lane S2 red is a share of routed requests, not a timing flake

Aberta
  • Algo errado?
#1,364 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
3/5
Tempo estimado
1-2 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
74/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Claramente especificada
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
go
Domínio
testing-qa

Direção de pesquisa

Start with internal/lane/e2e_test.go, especially lines 449, 467-468, 931, and 945, and run TestS2TheDefaultGoesSlowAndTheRouterMoves. Trace firstsScripted and the TTFT ledger, then add failure output showing each request's lane and ledger belief. Add deterministic coverage for exactly 2 and 3 broken answers, asserting about 79% and 0.0% respectively.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

area:tests bug sev:papercut

What happens

TestS2TheDefaultGoesSlowAndTheRouterMoves in internal/lane fails when other
suites run beside it. On a quiet box it passes. 316 consecutive runs in
isolation never reproduced it.

That is exactly the shape the repository says to file rather than rerun.

What the red actually means, which is not what it looks like

The assertion at internal/lane/e2e_test.go:467-468 does NOT divide a measured
time. It divides firstsScripted, a lookup into scriptedFirstWorld
(e2e_test.go:945). The wall figures computed at line 449 are logged and
asserted nowhere.

So the test is not timing-sensitive in the way its name suggests. It asserts a
share of requests that were routed to the good lane after the break.

The margin is a cliff, not a slope. Out of 20 routed requests:

answers from the broken lane asserted figure
2 about 79%
3 exactly 0.0%

A pass sits ONE request away from that cliff every time it passes. The red means
at least 3 of 20 routed requests reached the broken lane after the break, and
nothing about the failure output says so.

How load gets in

One channel only: the ledger's TTFT: e2eWorld(result.ttft) at
e2e_test.go:931, a measured time multiplied by 100, against a real gap of
8.4ms versus 40ms. Under load the wall p90 moved from 1.0s to 10.4s while the
asserted figure never moved at all, which is why the two look unrelated until
you follow the ledger.

Replication

Run the lane suite with the box under load, for instance a full internal/tui3
run beside it. It is not reliable, which is the point. In isolation it is green
316 times out of 316.

Acceptance

Not "it stops failing". A rerun proves nothing here.

  1. The failure output prints the per-request lane sequence and the ledger's
    belief at each step. Today a reader cannot tell 3-of-20 from 10-of-20.
  2. A deterministic test that drives the ledger to exactly 2 and exactly 3 broken
    answers and asserts 79% and 0.0%, so the cliff is written down rather than
    discovered.
  3. Only then, whatever fix follows.

Not a fix

task/lane-s2-under-load at a41e4abc5 is an unfinished edit from an agent that
died mid-change. It is parked, unmerged, and should not be read as a proposal.

Linguagem predominante
Go
Estrelas
115
Forks
14
Merge médio
9h 37min
PRs com merge (30d)
755

Preparar o ambiente

Ainda não verificamos os arquivos de configuração deste projeto. Comece pelo README e veja nosso guia da primeira contribuição para os passos gerais.

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de Agent-Field/CodeAF

Todas as issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Go

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.