[2.8] Store packet signature state (tri-state) per observation
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100
Research direction
The work adds a nullable tri-state xeddsa_signed on PacketObservation, a signature_present field on MtRawPacket, and meshtastic_known_signer and meshtastic_v28_identity on ObservedNode, so start from those three models and their migrations. Read the existing packet field docs in PACKET_FIELDS.md, which must also be updated. Done means null, false and true are each covered by tests and the docs describe what unsigned means, but this depends on pskillen/meshflow-bot#146 and pskillen/meshflow-api#463 landing first.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Part of pskillen/meshflow-api#437 (Meshtastic 2.8.x support). Code: SG-2 · Priority: Should · Size: M
Summary
PacketObservation.xeddsa_signed: nullable — null = unknown (2.7 feeder or old bot), false, true.MtRawPacket.signature_present.ObservedNode.meshtastic_known_signer,meshtastic_v28_identity.
2.8.2's default Compatible policy doesn't sign, so "unsigned" is normal and must never be alarming.
Acceptance criteria
- Tri-state tests
- Docs in PACKET_FIELDS.md
Depends on: pskillen/meshflow-bot#146 (SG-1), pskillen/meshflow-api#463 (FX-1)
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 1d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from pskillen/meshflow-api
-
enhancement meshtastic-2.8
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
pskillen/meshflow-api#459 ·
-
enhancement meshtastic-2.8
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
pskillen/meshflow-api#465 ·
-
enhancement meshtastic-2.8
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 22/100
pskillen/meshflow-api#464 ·
-
enhancement meshtastic-2.8
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
pskillen/meshflow-api#463 ·
-
enhancement meshtastic-2.8
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
pskillen/meshflow-api#462 ·
All issues in pskillen/meshflow-api
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
elviskahoro/sdk-python-attio#144 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
RenyiELBO raises TypeError when model has no sample sitesPossibly taken @alibb007 claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug]: Four evaluation scripts unpack init_memmachine_params's five return values into three namesOpen
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
MemMachine/MemMachine#1911 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days