Decision council and evil-twin critic: benchmark them

Open
  • Is something wrong?
#1,572 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
python
Domain
ai-infra-agents, testing-qa

Research direction

Start by reading the idea critic and decision council skills, then locate existing benchmark or evaluation entry points. Design held-out decision scenarios and compare both skills with single-pass answers and rival critique skills using a blind judge without a rubric. Done means the benchmark measures these comparisons and reports results; the issue names no files or tests to run.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

area:decisions enhancement priority:medium

Goal: measure the idea critic and the decision council against plain single-pass answers and rival critique skills on held-out decision scenarios, using a rubric-free blind judge.

Status: 📋 queued

Dominant language
Python
Stars
2
Forks
1
Avg merge
1h 27m
Merged PRs (30d)
561

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from protocol/perun

All issues in protocol/perun

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.