Hard coded algs in FAPI 2.0
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- security
Research direction
Start by locating the FAPI JWS algorithm declarations and comparing the hard-coded algorithms with the IANA registry. Check whether this issue duplicates existing work before proceeding. Done means the applicable FAPI algorithm references no longer rely on hard-coded values and remain aligned with the registry.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
(This might be a dup)
Hard-coded algs still seem to exist in FAPI for JWS algorithms.
We should be moving to reference the IANA registry.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from openid/fapi
-
component: FAPI 1: Advanced migrated-from-bitbucket priority: major type: bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
migrated-from-bitbucket priority: trivial type: bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
-
component: Implementation & Deployment Advice
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
Similar issues
-
Booking email verification fails for plus aliases with impersonation protection enabledPossibly taken @kankadev claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
calcom/cal.diy#30293 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 5 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
install: root SSH tmpfiles.d drop-in is labeled etc_runtime_t instead of etc_tPossibly taken @andrewdunndev claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
security trivy
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
kubefleet-dev/kubefleet#944 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days