Remove normative reference to SIOP?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 47/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- shell
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Read the specification’s normative references and the discussion in issue #726. Identify where SIOP is referenced normatively and determine which references can be removed based on that discussion. Done when the normative SIOP references are removed consistently; the issue does not name a file or test to start from.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
As discussed on today's WG call, as per #726 SIOP is now (almost) the only pre-final spec we reference. Can we just stop referencing it normatively?
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 114
- Forks
- 39
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from openid/OpenID4VP
-
discuss
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
All issues in openid/OpenID4VP
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
ehmpathy/rhachet-roles-ehmpathy#1231 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type:docs
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
nightgauge/nightgauge#2836 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
lancachenet/lancache-dns#158 ·
-
TerminalManagerPathTests: don't rely on GNU coreutils accepting a foreign argv0 (fails with Ubuntu 26.04's uutils)Possibly taken @odrobnik claimed this today. Openbug status::shipped
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Cocoanetics/SwiftACP#322 · 2 comments · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100