Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

The Behavior of the cv2.ORB algorithm changes from version 4.1.2.30 to 4.2.0.32

Open
#452 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
opencv, python

Research direction

Start with the inline alignImages reproducer and run it against the listed OpenCV-Python versions on Windows 10 using identical input images. Compare ORB keypoints, matches, homography, and timing to determine whether the regression is in the Python package or OpenCV core. Done means the regression is explained and fixed, or the issue is routed to the appropriate project with a minimal reproducible case.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Expected behaviour

I use the ORB image registration algorithm and it worked until 4.1.2.30. Same solution on same data!

Actual behaviour

From Version 4.1.2.32 to newest (4.5.1.48) it has a different (wrong) solution on the same data AND it needs about 3 times more time.

Steps to reproduce
def alignImages(im, imRef):
    MAX_FEATURES = 1000
    GOOD_MATCH_PERCENT = 0.5

    # Detect ORB features and compute descriptors.
    orb = cv2.ORB_create(MAX_FEATURES, scaleFactor=2, WTA_K=4, scoreType=cv2.ORB_HARRIS_SCORE, patchSize=61)

    keypoints1, descriptors1 = orb.detectAndCompute(im, None)
    keypoints2, descriptors2 = orb.detectAndCompute(imRef, None)
    #print('after kp2: ', time.time() - t)

    print('len keypoints:', len(keypoints1), ' ',len(keypoints2))

    # Match features.
    matcher = cv2.DescriptorMatcher_create(cv2.DESCRIPTOR_MATCHER_BRUTEFORCE_HAMMING)
    matches = matcher.match(descriptors1, descriptors2, None)

    #print('after matcher: ', time.time() - t)

    # Sort matches by score
    matches.sort(key=lambda x: x.distance, reverse=False)

    # Remove not so good matches
    numGoodMatches = int(len(matches) * GOOD_MATCH_PERCENT)
    matches = matches[:numGoodMatches]

    # Extract location of good matches
    points1 = np.zeros((len(matches), 2), dtype=np.float32)
    points2 = np.zeros((len(matches), 2), dtype=np.float32)

    for i, match in enumerate(matches):
        points1[i, :] = keypoints1[match.queryIdx].pt
        points2[i, :] = keypoints2[match.trainIdx].pt

    # Find homography
    h, mask = cv2.findHomography(points1, points2, cv2.RANSAC)
    return h

  • operating system: WIN 10 64-bit
Issue submission checklist

sorry, i don't know if it is a opencv-python issue or a opencv issue.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
5.4k
Forks
1k
Avg merge
22h 17m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from opencv/opencv-python

All issues in opencv/opencv-python

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.