type-test generation for subscripted `datetime64` and `timedelta64` operands
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100
Research direction
No file or test path is named; first locate the existing type-test generation for datetime64 and timedelta64 operands and identify the relevant binary operators. Add coverage for the stated None, int, datetime, date, and default combinations, then verify each expected result type, including the given timedelta64.add example.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Generate type-tests for all combinations of datetime64[{None, int, datetime, date, <default>}] and timedelta64[{None, int, timedeta, <default>}] for each of the relevant binary operators.
So e,g, one of them will verify that timedelta64[None].__add__(datetime64) -> datetime64[None]
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 79
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from numpy/numtype
-
topic: documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
topic: documentation
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
blame: Pyright tool: basedpyright
-
numpy.generic stubs: Incomplete
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
_numtype stubs: Refactor
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
tech debt
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
qualcomm/qai-appbuilder#275 ·