Add Freebox telephony status monitoring
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
Research direction
Read the existing Freebox plugin and its API v6 authorization/token flow, then review the Freebox phone API calls the reporter has tested. Confirm with maintainers whether this belongs in the existing plugin or a companion plugin before choosing an entry point. Done means optional read-only telephony status monitoring reuses the existing token, excludes call and personal data and write actions, and has tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Is there an existing issue for this?
- I have searched the existing open and closed issues
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
The existing Freebox plugin can discover the Freebox and connected LAN devices, but it does not currently expose telephony status available through the Freebox API.
The Freebox API provides read-only information about the telephone service and connected phone interfaces, for example:
- telephone service/network state
- FXS/phone interface status
- hardware fault state
- DECT enabled/registration state
- hook/ringing state
This could be useful for monitoring the Freebox telephone service without creating a separate external monitoring solution.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add optional read-only monitoring of Freebox telephony status to NetAlertX.
The implementation should reuse the existing Freebox authorization/token and should not require a second pairing.
Only non-sensitive operational information should be exposed. In particular, the feature should not collect or expose:
- call history
- phone numbers
- caller names
- contacts
- DECT PINs
- any write/configuration actions
I have confirmed on a Freebox v8 that the existing NetAlertX Freebox authorization can access the Freebox phone API successfully.
I would be happy to help implement this, but before starting I wanted to check whether this is something the maintainers would be interested in and whether you would prefer it to be integrated into the existing Freebox plugin or exposed as a separate companion plugin.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The main alternatives I considered are:
- Extending the existing Freebox device-scanner plugin directly.
- Adding a small companion Freebox telephony plugin using the existing Freebox pairing/token.
- Monitoring the telephone service outside NetAlertX.
A companion plugin may fit the current plugin model better because telephony interfaces are not normal network devices with MAC/IP identities, but I would prefer to follow the maintainers' preferred architecture before implementing anything.
Anything else?
I have already tested the underlying Freebox API read-only calls successfully.
The current Freebox integration uses API v6, and the same existing NetAlertX token was able to retrieve telephone service and phone-interface status without any additional pairing.
The intended scope would be monitoring only. No telephony configuration or call data would be included.
If this feature is considered useful, I am willing to prepare the implementation and tests against next_release following the project contribution guidelines.
Am I willing to test this? 🧪
- I will do my best to test this feature on the
netlertx-devimage when requested within 48h and report bugs to help deliver a great user experience for everyone and not to break existing installations.
Can I help implement this? 👩💻👨💻
- Yes
- No
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7.2k
- Forks
- 456
- Avg merge
- 17h 59m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 26
Getting set up
Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from netalertx/NetAlertX
-
bug 🐛
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
netalertx/NetAlertX#1856 · 1 comment · 7 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug] MCP SSE endpoint event omits the /server prefix, so clients behind the built-in nginx proxy get a 404 on /mcp/messagesPossibly taken @frdmn claimed this 1 day ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Docker 🐋
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug 🐛 next release/in dev image 🚀 Waiting for reply⏳
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
netalertx/NetAlertX#1851 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug] Internet-Check returns 0.0.0.0 when IPv6 is enabled and OpenDNS lookup failsPossibly taken @pujitha24 claimed this 6 days ago. Openbug 🐛 next release/in dev image 🚀 Waiting for reply⏳
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
netalertx/NetAlertX#1845 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in netalertx/NetAlertX
Similar issues
-
[oblt-aw][autodoc] Update workflow docs for gh-aw v0.92.5 and detector permission scopePossibly taken @github-actions claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
roadmap-100
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
comp/tools P2 tool/browser tool/file type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#143418 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
python-hyper/uritemplate#164 ·