Vague format specification.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- documentation, networking
Research direction
Start by reviewing the protocol definitions in the repository's CSV and the multiaddr format described in the issue. Identify which address and binary representations are currently unspecified, especially IPv4 and network byte order. Done means the relevant protocol specifications clearly define their representations and provide enough information to implement multiaddr consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This format seems very vague as to the specifics of each protocol.
It may seem very intuitive that an ipv4 address (a 32 bit unsigned integer) should look like .<bits 23 to 16 in decimal>.<bits 15 to 8 in decimal>. (2130706433 should be represented as 127.0.0.1) but I think this should be clearly specified somewhere. The same goes for the binary representation, network byte order may seem like the obvious choice but how do I know what to use for a multiaddr?
These are just protocols which I know of and they have well known and established address representations, there are plenty of protocols in the csv with which I am not familiar. I am not sure how to go about implementing multiaddr without this information.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 482
- Forks
- 87
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from multiformats/multiaddr
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
multiformats/multiaddr#181 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
multiformats/multiaddr#178 · 4 comments ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 10/100
multiformats/multiaddr#168 ·
-
Multiaddr URI schemeOpen
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
multiformats/multiaddr#165 · 2 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
multiformats/multiaddr#156 · 1 reaction ·
All issues in multiformats/multiaddr
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[E2E Scenario Tests] HTTP logs capture export requests from test framework, polluting golden filesOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-config-connector#13675 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
ai-inspected
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day