DNS auth 401 "no MCP public key found" despite correct, globally-propagated base64 TXT record
Maintainers usually reply within 5 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- authentication, networking
Research direction
Start with the registry's DNS authentication path, using the mcp-publisher login dns flow and the reported 401 as the reproduction. Compare the TXT lookup result used by the registry with the public and authoritative resolver results listed here, and investigate whether stale negative caching is involved. Done means the registry recognizes the published base64 proof and DNS login succeeds, or the resolver/cache behavior is identified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
DNS authentication (mcp-publisher login dns) fails with 401 no MCP public key found in DNS TXT records, even though the required MCP proof TXT record is correctly published, well-formed, and globally propagated. The registry's resolver appears to be serving/caching a stale negative result: every public resolver and the authoritative nameserver return the correct base64 Ed25519 key, but the registry still cannot see it after ~3 hours.
Environment
mcp-publisherversion: 1.8.1- Domain:
solides.com.br(apex TXT record, authoritative = AWS Route 53, TTL 60s) - Auth method:
login dns
What the publisher expects (from login dns output)
Expected proof record:
v=MCPv1; k=ed25519; p=SKhuBvoz+KAh+PdxO6WHDunygJ03s6ahwSbR6FR3wtw=
What is actually published (and globally propagated)
The TXT record on the solides.com.br apex is identical to the expected proof, is a single value (no 255-char chunking, no duplicate v=MCPv1), with TTL 60s. Verified just now against 5 resolvers plus the authoritative NS:
| Resolver | Returns |
|---|---|
| 8.8.8.8 (Google) | v=MCPv1; k=ed25519; p=SKhuBvoz+KAh+PdxO6WHDunygJ03s6ahwSbR6FR3wtw= |
| 1.1.1.1 (Cloudflare) | identical |
| 9.9.9.9 (Quad9) | identical |
| 208.67.222.222 (OpenDNS) | identical |
| ns-1666.awsdns-16.co.uk (authoritative Route 53) | identical |
Reproduce:
dig +short TXT solides.com.br @8.8.8.8 | grep MCPv1
Actual error
Error: failed to get token: failed to exchange dns signature: token exchange failed with status 401:
{"title":"Unauthorized","status":401,"detail":"DNS authentication failed",
"errors":[{"message":"no MCP public key found in DNS TXT records"}]}
Likely cause
The record was previously published for a few days in hex encoding (p=48a8..., 64 chars) before being corrected to the spec-required base64 encoding. We suspect the registry's internal DNS resolver has a stale cache / negative-cache entry for solides.com.br TXT that is outliving the record's 60s TTL (3h+ and counting), so it never re-fetches the corrected base64 key. The public internet has fully converged on the correct value.
Ask
Could you confirm which resolver the registry backend uses for DNS auth, and whether its cache for solides.com.br TXT can be flushed / its TTL honored? Happy to provide any further diagnostics.
(Note: the p= value above is an Ed25519 public key — safe to share for reproduction.)
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 7.3k
- Forks
- 1k
- Avg merge
- 4d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from modelcontextprotocol/registry
-
3 registry records that cannot resolve for any client, and a caution about single-pass dead countsOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1692 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 5 days
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 80/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1657 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 5 days
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1652 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 5 days
-
IsValidRemoteURL only blocks literal localhost/127.0.0.1 — misses [::1], 127.0.0.0/8, 0.0.0.0, and private/link-local addressesPossibly taken @amitvijapur claimed this 81 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1465 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 5 days
-
GitLab repository URLs with nested groups/subgroups are rejected by validatorPossibly taken @anneheartrecord claimed this 120 days ago. Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 84/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1359 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 5 days
All issues in modelcontextprotocol/registry
Similar issues
-
bug triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
FairwindsOps/nova#484 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
automated-analysis code-quality cookie
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
github/gh-aw#67517 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[otelcol] print-config help text still requires the removed otelcol.printInitialConfig feature gatePossibly taken @girishkvs claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#16143 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug good first issue load-balancing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
ktrubilo9/edge-proxy#53 ·