Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Authentication in High Level MCPServer

Open
#3,283 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
38/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Quiet
Tech stack
python

Research direction

Start with the high-level MCPServer authentication configuration and compare it with the low-level BearerAuthBackend and TokenVerifier path described in the issue. Trace why AuthSettings, issuer_url, and resource_server_url are required; done means identifying a supported configuration or confirming a focused API gap.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

P3 question v1 v2

Question

I'm trying to understand the authentication model in the new MCP Python SDK v2.

I want to implement the simplest possible authentication for a remote Streamable HTTP MCP server:

  1. The server has a pre-configured bearer token.
  2. The client sends Authorization: Bearer <token>.
  3. The server verifies the token.
  4. If valid, the MCP request is allowed.
  5. There is no OAuth login flow and no Authorization Server involved.

I initially tried using TokenVerifier:

class StaticTokenVerifier(TokenVerifier):
    async def verify_token(self, token: str) -> AccessToken | None:
        if token == ACCESS_TOKEN:
            return AccessToken(token=token)

        return None

However, MCPServer requires AuthSettings whenever a token_verifier is supplied. AuthSettings in my version requires both issuer_url and resource_server_url.

I don't understand why issuer_url is required for this use case. There is no Authorization Server issuing the token—the token is simply pre-configured on the MCP server.

Adding AuthSettings also appears to cause the client to enter the OAuth discovery/authorization flow. For example, I encountered:

The connection is now reaching the OAuth authorization step,
but this server does not implement an /authorize endpoint.

I also encountered a protected-resource URL validation error when the URL differed only by localhost vs 127.0.0.1:

Protected resource [http://localhost:10000/mcp] does not match expected
[http://127.0.0.1:10000/mcp] (or origin)

My understanding is that TokenVerifier and the OAuth discovery/authorization-server configuration are separate concerns. The low-level SDK code appears to support BearerAuthBackend(token_verifier) independently, while resource_server_url is used for protected-resource metadata.

Is there a supported way in MCP Python SDK v2 to implement simple bearer-token authentication for Streamable HTTP without configuring an OAuth Authorization Server and without having to implement or manually compose Starlette middleware?

In other words, I'm looking for the equivalent of:

HTTP Request
     ↓
Authorization: Bearer alice-token
     ↓
TokenVerifier
     ↓
valid → MCP request
invalid → 401

without requiring:

Authorization Server
    ↓
/authorize
/token
OAuth discovery
issuer_url
resource_server_url

Is this supported by the high-level MCPServer API, or is OAuth intentionally a prerequisite for using TokenVerifier?

Dominant language
Python
Stars
24.3k
Forks
4k
Avg merge
1d 11h
Merged PRs (30d)
30

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

All issues in modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.