Resource templates should support handlers
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- api, backend-api-design
Research direction
Start by locating the existing (A)syncResourceSpecification and the registration paths used for resources and prompts. Trace how resource-template requests are handled, then define what a handler-capable specification must expose for URI parameters. Done means templated resources can resolve request parameters and serve content without pre-registering every URI.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Expected Behavior
There should be a ResourceTemplateSpecification, similar to (A)syncResourceSpecification, so that we can have access to an exchange and handle requests properly.
Current Behavior
Currently unlike resources or prompts, there's no way to define a handler for resource templates. The same spec is used in all contexts, but doesn't allow supplying a handler.
Context
This is a serious limitation which defeats the concept of resource templates. For example, we would like to implement something like this in Micronaut MCP:
@ResourceTemplate(uriTemplate = "file://my-resource/{item}", description="A templated resource")
String templated(String item) {
return "Hello, " + item;
}
That is, the content of the template depends on the URI parameters. Today there's no way to do this because the only thing we can do is register resource templates, but no handlers. Therefore, in order to serve the resources, we have to register all of them as regular resources, which makes the templating redundant. This also assumes that we can know in advance all the combinations of valid path elements values, which is obviously not possible.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 3.7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 1d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk
-
area/transport bug P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1136 ·
-
area/client bug P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1124 · 1 comment ·
-
ServerCapabilities.logging is added unconditionally, overriding the caller's explicit capabilities Openbug P2 ready for work
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1086 · 1 comment ·
-
enhancement good first issue P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1067 ·
-
bug P2 ready for work
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#898 · 1 comment ·
All issues in modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk
Similar issues
-
bug untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
opensearch-project/ml-commons#5094 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
emitter:client:csharp feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
affects/8.10 affects/8.9 component/clients kind/bug likelihood/mid severity/mid
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Two open-case totals on one screen: the Programs tile says 15,858 and the nav badge says 15,868 Openbug frontend maui-pilot
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100