[HELP NEEDED] io.modelcontextprotocol.spec.McpError: Client failed to initialize by explicit API call
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- api, backend, networking
Research direction
Reproduce the failure with client.initialize().block() using HTTPS, then inspect HttpClientStreamableHttpTransport.java around line 512 and ResponseSubscribers.java around line 287. Compare the HTTPS initialization response with the working SSE path and the reported VS Code behavior. Done means Java HTTPS initialization completes successfully without the McpError.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a chat-based plugin using the MCP Java SDK (io.modelcontextprotocol.sdk:mcp:0.11.0) and getting the error io.modelcontextprotocol.spec.McpError: Client failed to initialize by explicit API call when using HTTPS transport.
Problem: Client initialization fails with the above error when using HTTPS transport. The same server works perfectly with VS Code (which also uses HTTPS) and with SSE transport from our Java client.
Context:
- The MCP server is an internal implementation that works perfectly with VS Code via HTTPS
- SSE transport connects successfully with the same server from our Java client
- Only HTTPS transport is failing during the initialization phase in Java SDK
- Server definitely supports MCP-over-HTTP since VS Code connects successfully
Code snippet:
if ("http".equalsIgnoreCase(transportType)) { // Note: actually using HTTPS URL
HttpClientStreamableHttpTransport.Builder builder = HttpClientStreamableHttpTransport.builder(mcpUrl)
.customizeRequest(requestBuilder -> {
System.out.println("Customizing request for HTTP MCP client: " + mcpUrl);
// Add authentication headers, if available
if (authHeader != null && !authHeader.isEmpty()) {
authHeader.forEach((key, value) -> {
requestBuilder.setHeader(key, value);
});
}
})
.endpoint(URI.create(mcpUrl).getRawPath());
client = McpClient.async(builder.build()).requestTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(60)).build();
}
client.initialize().block();
Underlying Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to send message: DummyEvent[responseInfo=jdk.internal.net.http.ResponseInfoImpl@fbe869d]
at io.modelcontextprotocol.client.transport.HttpClientStreamableHttpTransport.lambda$sendMessage$27(HttpClientStreamableHttpTransport.java:512)
...
at io.modelcontextprotocol.client.transport.ResponseSubscribers$BodilessResponseLineSubscriber.hookOnComplete(ResponseSubscribers.java:287)
Key observations:
1. Error occurs during client initialization with `client.initialize().block()`
2. Involves `BodilessResponseLineSubscriber.hookOnComplete` suggesting HTTP response processing issue
3. Same server works with VS Code via HTTPS - so server implementation should be correct
4. Same server works with SSE transport from Java - so authentication/connectivity is fine
Questions:
1. Has anyone encountered this specific `McpError` with HTTP transport initialization?
2. Are there differences in how the Java SDK's HTTP transport vs VS Code's HTTP client handle MCP initialization?
3. Could this be related to HTTP headers, request methods, or connection handling specific to the Java SDK?
4. Are there additional configuration options for `HttpClientStreamableHttpTransport` that might resolve this?
What works vs what doesn't:
- ✅ VS Code → Server via HTTPS
- ✅ Java Client → Server via SSE
- ❌ Java Client → Server via HTTPS (fails with initialization error)
This suggests the issue is specifically with how the Java SDK's HTTP transport handles initialization compared to VS Code's implementation.
Any insights on resolving this initialization error with HTTP transport would be greatly appreciated!
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 3.7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 1d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk
-
area/transport bug P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1136 ·
-
area/client bug P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1124 · 1 comment ·
-
ServerCapabilities.logging is added unconditionally, overriding the caller's explicit capabilities Openbug P2 ready for work
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1086 · 1 comment ·
-
enhancement good first issue P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#1067 ·
-
bug P2 ready for work
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk#898 · 1 comment ·
All issues in modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk
Similar issues
-
bug untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
opensearch-project/ml-commons#5094 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
emitter:client:csharp feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
affects/8.10 affects/8.9 component/clients kind/bug likelihood/mid severity/mid
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Two open-case totals on one screen: the Programs tile says 15,858 and the nav badge says 15,868 Openbug frontend maui-pilot
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100