[perf-scan] 2026-11-10 -- performance opportunities found
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 67/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- git, python
- Domain
- cli, performance
Research direction
Read src/apm_cli/deps/tiered_ref_resolver.py around lines 335–352 and trace how it checks heads, tags, and bare refs. Confirm the lookup behavior with the relevant resolver tests, then reduce the subprocess calls while preserving candidate order and short-circuiting; done when the tests pass and each ref needs at most one subprocess.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Performance Scan - 2026-11-10
Automated scan of src/apm_cli/ for algorithmic performance anti-patterns.
1 finding(s) identified (low priority).
Findings
[F] Sequential subprocess fallbacks -- src/apm_cli/deps/tiered_ref_resolver.py:335-352
- Current: up to 3 sequential
git rev-parse --verifysubprocess spawns per ref (heads, tags, bare ref), each ~ms of process startup, per dependency. - Proposed: 1 subprocess per ref.
- Fix: Use a single
git rev-parse --verify --quietcall (orgit for-each-ref/show-refonce per bare repo and cache) instead of spawning up to three processes. Low priority: candidates short-circuit on first hit and iterations are order-dependent.
Scan coverage
- src/apm_cli/ (507 files scanned)
- Patterns checked: A (quadratic loops), B (linear scan in loop),
C (unconditional expensive ops), D (redundant config parsing),
E (heavy top-level imports; commands/ already use lazy imports for heavy modules), F (sequential independent I/O)
Generated by Daily Performance Scanner · copilot · auto · 17.6 AIC · ⌖ 0.565 AIC · ⊞ 5.8K · ◷
- expires on Nov 17, 2026, 1:24 AM UTC
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 4.3k
- Forks
- 415
- Avg merge
- 3d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 120
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from microsoft/apm
-
[BUG] HTTP lifecycle dispatch treats a NO_PROXY-only environment as corporate egress and skips the resolve-and-pinned sessionPossibly taken @bodapatisaikrishna claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type/automation type/performance
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/cli type/automation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[BUG] Global Codex instruction compilation ignores CODEX_HOMEPossibly taken @xubenqiang claimed this 5 days ago. Openstatus/accepted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
microsoft/apm#3483 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 60/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
external
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
langchain-ai/docs#7652 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[oblt-aw][autodoc] Document new e2e-secret-leak-artifacts workflow and update e2e-all leaf listOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 79/100
elastic/oblt-aw#2513 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug p2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
NCAR/CLM-Tutorial#113 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
qazbnm456/awesome-web-security#279 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 10 days