PTE0004 raised when publishing on cloud environments without reason
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 50/100
Research direction
Start by reproducing the issue in a cloud sandbox with the namespace and using-directive examples from the report, then compare publishing with VSCode or AL-Go, where it does not occur. Done means the same permission set publishes without PTE0004 when the referenced table is resolved through a using directive.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
1. Describe the bug
This bug has been signaled first on Viva Engage.
I am experiencing an issue and was wondering whether other partners have encountered the same behavior.
My observations are as follows:
When deploying a PTE in a BC FR environment (Platform 28.0.52495.0 + Application 28.3.52162.52579), in my case by manually uploading the .app file, the deployment fails with the error below if:
- the permission set is defined inside a namespace, and
- the object referenced in the permission set is resolved through a using directive.
Package validation failed due to the following error(s): (5,13): error PTE0004: Table 80000 '***' is missing a matching permission set. (5,13): error PTE0004: Table 80001 '***' is missing a matching permission set. (7,13): error PTE0004: Table 80003 '***' is missing a matching permission set. - Job Id : e581f2c1-b75d-46da-8dc8-4abbcb2362fb
As soon as I remove the using directives and fully qualify the object names in the permission set, the deployment succeeds.
2. To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Create an AL PTE app with one table and one permissionset (with no namespace)
- Publish it to a cloud sandbox
- Add a namespace to the table: MyApp.Tables
- Add a namespace to the permissionset: MyApp.PermissionSet
It seems important that both objects are in different namespaces
- Add the table in the permissionset and do not fully qualify the table: use a using directive instead.
- Publish it to a cloud sandbox... sometimes you will get this error.
namespace MyApp.PermissionSet;
using MyApp.Tables;
permissionset 80000 "MyApp Permissions"
{
Assignable = true;
Caption = 'MyApp Permissions';
Permissions = tabledata "MyApp Table" = RIMD,
table "MyApp Table" = X;
}
namespace MyApp.Tables;
table 80000 "MyApp Table"
{
fields
{
field(1; "PK"; Integer) { }
}
}
3. Expected behavior
PTE0004 should not be raised.
4. Actual behavior
PTE0004 is raised even if the table is part of a permissionset.
5. Versions:
This issue does not occur when compiling on VSCode or with AL-Go. It only occurs when publishing on a cloud environment.
It has been reproduced on the following platform/application versions:
- On July, 17th 2026: Platform 28.0.52495.0 + Application 28.3.52162.52579
- On September, 30th 2026: Platform 28.0.54846.0 + Application 28.5.54151.55108
- Dominant language
- PowerShell
- Stars
- 884
- Forks
- 285
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from microsoft/AL
-
accepted al-tools bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 8/100
-
accepted
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 12/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 15/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
Similar issues
-
chore s3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 83/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug] The Aliyun cloud instance catalog silently truncates on a short pagePossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#6083 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 6 days
-
Bug Report: S3 device signs content-length on bodyless GET/HEAD, breaks R2 reads (403 SignatureDoesNotMatch)Possibly taken @ridhotamma claimed this 1 day ago. Openproduct / self-hosted product / storage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
appwrite/appwrite#14326 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug]: snapshot download mishandles reader close errorsPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Openarea/storage kind/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
agent-substrate/substrate#2445 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day