Investigate regression: TTL output on channel 4 may no longer toggle during runtime
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- embedded-iot, testing-qa
Research direction
Start by comparing recent stimulation, square, and TTL-related commits with the effective runtime config for stimulus.square.ttl_output and channel selection. Inspect doric_light_source.py, especially LightSourceSettings fields isTTLOutput, channelIdx, and ttlModulation.*, then reproduce with a minimal ch4 configuration if possible. Done means distinguishing regression, config mismatch, or false alarm and adding a focused regression test or validation step.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
As of 2026-04-15, there is a suspected regression where TTL output on channel 4 no longer behaves correctly during app-driven runs, despite the downstream electronics appearing healthy when tested directly through Doric.
Observed report:
- it was believed to be working on 2026-04-13
- it was not behaving correctly on 2026-04-14
- direct Doric-side testing on 2026-04-15 suggests the electronics path is fine
This points to either a recent software/config regression or a mismatch between intended runtime settings and what is actually being written to the device.
Why this matters
This is exactly the class of issue where we need better confidence that the app wrote the intended Doric settings, especially around TTL-related configuration.
Candidate investigation path
- compare recent commits touching stimulation / square / TTL-related code and config behavior
- verify the effective runtime config for
stimulus.square.ttl_outputand any relevant channel selection for the failing protocol - check whether channel indexing or channel-resolution behavior changed around
ch4 - inspect the exact
LightSourceSettingsfields written indoric_light_source.py, especiallyisTTLOutput,channelIdx, andttlModulation.* - compare known-good vs suspected-bad protocol overlays and session metadata
- reproduce with a minimal config targeting only
ch4if possible
Important context
Direct hardware/electronics verification through Doric appears fine, so this should be treated first as an app/runtime regression until disproven.
Follow-up data to attach later
- session metadata or CSV/TTL artifacts from a known-good run
- session metadata or CSV/TTL artifacts from a failing run
- exact overlay/config used in each case
- commit range between the last known-good and first known-bad behavior
Acceptance criteria
- identify whether this is a software regression, config mismatch, or false alarm
- if real, isolate the responsible change or code path
- add a focused regression test or validation step so channel-targeted TTL behavior does not silently drift again
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from matiasandina/uid_python_api
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
file cleanupOpen
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
matiasandina/uid_python_api#14 · 3 comments ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
All issues in matiasandina/uid_python_api
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area:docs
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
RailtownAI/railtracks#1633 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
review-panel severity:low
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
kristovatlas/coin-accounting#152 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation :blue_book:
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
PennyLaneAI/pennylane#10280 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
`pipx reinstall` prints a Python traceback when the reinstall failsPossibly taken @ParamTanna claimed this today. Openbug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day