Databases to analyze
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- bioinformatics
Research direction
Start by reviewing the three proposed resources: EnrichR, MSigDB, and reactome.db. Determine what gene sets or libraries each provides and define the comparison needed for the pathway-resource study; done means the selected databases and analysis scope are documented clearly enough to guide implementation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Sources of gene sets and libraries (not specific pathways but interesting)
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from llrs/pathways-study
-
Other related work Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
llrs/pathways-study#2 ·
-
enhancement
llrs/pathways-study#1 · 1 assignee ·
All issues in llrs/pathways-study
Similar issues
-
documentation pkg infrastructure
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
epiverse-trace/epiparameter#511 ·
-
function:write_dwc
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Urgent request: Due to vulnerabilities move to API version 12.6.1 (12.6.2 eventually) or 13.1.1 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
jbkunst/highcharter#849 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
r-lib/pkgdepends#485 · 3 comments ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100