permission_check fails on fork PRs before it checks anything (checkout v7 refuses the head ref)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 70/100
Research direction
Read init-svc-executable-permissions.yml first, then compare the checkout step in docker-mod-builder.yml. Trace the permission check and the git trees API approach described in the issue; done means fork-head permission checks work without unsafe checkout or changing pull_request_target safety, including the documented fork and internal cases.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
init-svc-executable-permissions.yml fails on a fork pull request that touches run, finish, check or root/migrations/*. The job stops before any file is read, because actions/checkout@v7.0.1 refuses pull_request.head.sha in a pull_request_target workflow.
PR #190 shows it: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-baseimage-selkies/actions/runs/33459741080/job/99707212121
The checkout step ends with:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. This workflow runs with the base repository's GITHUB_TOKEN, secrets, default-branch cache scope, and runner access. Fetching and executing a fork's code in that trusted context commonly leads to "pwn request" vulnerabilities. To opt in, review the risks at https://gh.io/securely-using-pull_request_target and set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.
"Check Permissions" is then skipped and the job fails. On that head SHA (a5272e08) all 13 run/finish files are 100755, so the check would have passed.
The switch to checkout 7 reached v1 with 6c9815b8 on 2026-07-03; the first fork run after that is from 2026-07-06. Since then 45 fork-head runs across linuxserver have failed and 7 internal-head runs have passed. After the switch and before that first fork run, docker-sabnzbd run 28709064096 (2026-07-04) passed: **** All perms look good ****. Twelve open fork pull requests carry a red permission_check; three more are green from before the switch.
f3577570 pinned the step to the head SHA because the check needs the PR's own files. The file modes can be read without a checkout: the git trees API on the base repository reaches the fork head through refs/pull/N/head, so the job can flag any matching blob that is not 100755 without fetching fork code. At a5272e08 it returns truncated: false, 151 entries, 13 of them run/finish blobs, all 100755. That leaves pull_request_target and the pinned ref untouched, with no allow-unsafe-pr-checkout. The same checkout step sits in docker-mod-builder.yml, which handles CR_PAT and DOCKERPASS.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 6
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 11h 55m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
vicharanashala/fln#564 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
haskell-actions/setup#152 ·
-
feature-request helm
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
gravitational/teleport#69785 ·
-
A cancelled tests run makes the coverage comment workflow fail and reports it as a red check on main Openarea: ci bug perceived difficulty: 3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Nitjsefnie-Harness-Commons/daedalus#921 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
TencentCloud/Octop#1007 ·