[Usability] Wording rsp. inconcise reference
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
@Ph4t3 is already working on this.
Since Oct 20, 2026.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 76/100
Research direction
Find the danger-zone settings page and read the description for the switch that affects group visibility. Rewrite it to identify which group is affected and explain why changing the setting is considered dangerous; remove the redundant sentence about creating public and private assets. Done when the description is clear about the scope and risk.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Issue description
On https://devguard.opencode.de/%40opencode/projects/digital/settings/danger-zone the description has no practical content, because "group" seems to mean something else that a "group" in Gitlab lingo: Consequently this description is rather misleading. Specifically here, the group "evb-it" and its sub-group "EVB-IT digital" (displayed at the top of the webpage) are both public, already! There is no other "group" visible ore mentioned anywhere, hence one must come to the conclusion that these groups are becoming publicly visible, when flipping this switch.
Side note
The second sentence of the description "It allows creating public and private assets." is superfluous, because it is obvious that such a switch allows for toggling between "private" and "public". But what the rather generic word "asset" is supposed to address in this context is incomprehensible.
Suggested solution
Phrase this description anew, so it clearly denotes what kind of "group" is referred to here, and which specific "group" is going to be affected. Furthermore, a hint why this is considered dangerous would be helpful to fully comprehend the risks.
Screenshot
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 195
- Forks
- 47
- Avg merge
- 2d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 31
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from l3montree-dev/devguard
-
component/devguard-documentation priority:high
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
l3montree-dev/devguard#3101 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
component/devguard-documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
l3montree-dev/devguard#3090 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
l3montree-dev/devguard#3049 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
component/devguard-documentation
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
l3montree-dev/devguard#2926 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Dependency Risks: show CVE instead of GHSAPossibly taken @juliankepka claimed this 9 days ago. Openfeature-request
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
l3montree-dev/devguard#2913 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in l3montree-dev/devguard
Similar issues
-
automation doc-healer documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
tsukumogami/tsuku#2804 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Anthropic /v1/messages: only the last thinking block of an assistant message is keptPossibly taken @Shayan12456 claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
ollama/ollama#19415 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
raised-by:verifier
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
medici-finance/assay#5039 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
metax CheckHealth reads Status.Capacity, so unhealthy Metax-GPU nodes are never cleaned upPossibly taken @barbierajput378-pixel claimed this today. Openkind/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Project-HAMi/HAMi#3343 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day