Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Unnecessary synchronisation?

Open
#1,572 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Refactor
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
java

Research direction

Start in src/com/sun/jna/NativeLibrary.java at lines 186-188 and inspect how searchPaths, the ConcurrentHashMap, and the synchronized block are used there. Determine whether the synchronization is needed and whether the update target is correct; the work is done when the synchronization behavior is justified and the relevant existing behavior remains intact.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

The synch. here appears to be unnecessary:
https://github.com/java-native-access/jna/blob/365629530635440381f63939f7891456992fe91b/src/com/sun/jna/NativeLibrary.java#L186-L188

searchPaths is a ConcurrentHashMap, so does it need synch?
It also does not make sense to me to synch. on the value being added, rather than the target being updated.

Dominant language
Java
Stars
8.9k
Forks
1.7k
Avg merge
1d 13h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from java-native-access/jna

All issues in java-native-access/jna

Similar issues

More Java issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.