Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

Hardware acceleration and fingerprinting

オープン
#896 コメント 2 件 リアクション 5 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
30/100
issue の種類
機能追加
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
停滞
技術スタック
javascript

調査の方向性

WebCodecs仕様のハードウェアアクセラレーションのセクションとVideoEncoder.isConfigSupportedの例から始め、リンクされているBugzillaの報告と既存の2つのコメントを確認してください。fingerprintingの制約下でのhardwareAccelerationの動作と、作成者から観測できる結果について合意し、仕様化されれば、このIssueは完了です。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

I just filed a bug on Bugzilla but what Firefox is doing is spec compliant, so I wanted to raise the issue here too.

Background

I'm making a website that heavily utilizes WebCodecs. I need to determine the encoding codec and always want to use hardware encoding (when available) as battery life is more important than fidelity (conference call).

  1. Loop through all codecs in order of network efficiency: av1, vp9, hevc, h254, vp8, etc
  2. Check if the browser supports hardware acceleration, if so return it.
  3. Repeat the loop but this time with software acceleration.

I'm using the hardwareAcceleration: "prefer-hardware" field to determine if hardware acceleration is supported. Here's an example of one of the checks:

VideoEncoder.isConfigSupported({
    codec: "av01.0.08M.08",
    width: 1280,
    height: 720,
    hardwareAcceleration: "prefer-hardware",
}).then(console.log)

Here's a little modal I created to visualize the process and the results on my M2 laptop and Chrome.

Image

Problem

Here's what Firefox reports:

Image

Ignore the partial support for video capture (MediaStreamTrackProcessor polyfill).

The problem is that Firefox is reporting hardware acceleration for AV1, VP9, etc. So my encoder will naively select one of those codecs and suddenly my CPU is on fire.

My guess is that Firefox is ignoring the hardwareAcceleration field to avoid fingerprinting. Here's the relevant section in the specification:

If a User Agent does not implement [media-capabilities] for reasons of fingerprinting, they SHOULD ignore the HardwareAcceleration preference

Proposed

If the browser won't respect hardwareAcceleration because it can be used for fingerprinting, then the browser should return an error somehow. I don't think the browser should silently ignore important configuration values without feedback.

If I knew that Firefox doesn't allow probing for hardware acceleration, then I would use H.264 because hardware acceleration is very common and easier on the CPU. Then I could also report hardware acceleration as "unknown" and maybe show a modal explaining why performance might be poor.

My suggestions:

  1. Don't return hardwareAcceleration in the config returned by isConfigSupported. Unfortunately, this isn't quite correct, as hardwareAcceleration is supported but only as a hint.
  2. Add "require-hardware" and "require-software" as options, throwing an exception (or returning false?) if they are used on browsers that care about fingerprinting.
  3. Firefox pls allow me to detect hardware acceleration. Otherwise I can't use newer codecs for fear of melting silicon.

I think #2 is the best option. It's kind of strange that Chrome returns isConfigSupported=false when "prefer-hardware" is used. If it's just a hint, like the "prefer" implies, then it should always return true if either software or hardware encoding is available... right?

主要言語
HTML
スター
1.3k
フォーク
192
平均マージ
21時間 7分
マージ済み PR(30日)
8

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

w3c/webcodecs のほかの issue

w3c/webcodecs の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Backend & API Design の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。