Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

Best practice for persisting large accumulated LangGraph state without hitting ScheduleActivityTask payload size limits

オープン
#1,894 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
35/100
issue の種類
ドキュメント
明瞭さ
説明が足りない
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
python

調査の方向性

Start with the LangGraphPlugin activity boundary and the workflow.execute_activity call described in the issue, then review how the Postgres-backed checkpointer and Temporal activity payload limits interact. The issue is complete when maintainers document a supported persistence pattern and clarify whether payload codecs, chunking, or streaming are appropriate for large state.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

We're running LangGraph-based agents through temporalio.contrib.langgraph.LangGraphPlugin, where each graph node executes as a Temporal Activity. The workflows accumulate state across many sequential (and some parallel) node executions — investigation-style agents with 20-30+ nodes producing tool-call transcripts, messages, etc.

Before wrapping these graphs with Temporal, we ran them directly against LangGraph's own Postgres-backed checkpointer, which persists automatically after every node (every "superstep"). Once we moved execution behind Temporal Activities, that per-node persistence went away — the nodes now run as separate Activities without a shared in-process checkpointer, so nothing writes to Postgres until we explicitly do so ourselves.

Our first attempt reintroduced persistence as a single workflow.execute_activity(persist_result_activity, args=[...full accumulated final state...]) call after ainvoke() returns, so it survives even if no client ever reconnects to read handle.result(). That worked for small/medium runs, but a larger run hit:

BadScheduleActivityAttributes: ScheduleActivityTaskCommandAttributes.Input exceeds size limit.

...which terminated the entire workflow server-side (WORKFLOW_EXECUTION_TERMINATED) — a total loss, worse than the gap we were trying to close. Individual per-node Activity payloads never approached the limit (29/29 node-Activities completed fine); only the one bulk end-of-run payload did.

Our leading fix: restore the original per-node persistence behavior — write each node's own delta to Postgres from inside that node's own Activity execution (no extra execute_activity hop needed, since the node body already runs as an Activity) — rather than shipping the whole accumulated state through Temporal in one call at the end. This keeps every persistence write proportional to a single node's output, matching what the pre-Temporal execution already did natively.

Questions for the maintainers:

  1. Is per-node/per-Activity persistence the idiomatic pattern here, or is there Temporal-native support for this (e.g. something LangGraphPlugin already offers) that we're missing?
  2. We also considered gzip-compressing the final payload before passing it as Activity args — it only raises the ceiling rather than removing it, and doesn't restore true mid-run durability (a crash just before that one activity still loses the whole run's state). Are there better-supported options for cases where a single large Activity payload is genuinely unavoidable (custom PayloadCodec, chunking, streaming activity results)?
  3. Any general guidance on structuring Activities around something like LangGraph, where per-node output sizes vary widely and the framework's own native checkpointing gets bypassed by the Activity boundary?
主要言語
Python
スター
1.2k
フォーク
241
平均マージ
3日 2時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
49

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

temporalio/sdk-python のほかの issue

temporalio/sdk-python の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。