Ladder climb L1->L4: 30 cics-crucible programs below L4, by family (follows #6072)

クローズ
#7,434 コメント 56 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
初心者へのやさしさ
12/100
issue の種類
機能追加
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
python
領域
testing-qa

調査の方向性

Start by running ladder_gaps.py on origin/main to get the live list of programs below L4, since the names in the issue are only a starting point. Read the ladder-slice skill and tests/equivalence/infeasible_outcomes.json (with its reasons, per #4602) before adding any case scenarios or reviewed infeasible outcomes. Done means one family's programs reach L4 in a single PR, with before and after net branch coverage stated for each program.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

claim:melek legacy-modernization priority: high scope:core testing

Why

#6072 finished the 74 burned programs it listed (CardDemo, CBSA, GenApp, zECS, DBB). The ladder's remaining work is the cics-crucible programs, which #6072 never listed. This issue is now the focus ladder anchor, and churn's ladder slices run under it.

Numbers from the evidence measure of 2026-11-01T12:31Z, 209 programs: L0 8, L1 11, L2 15, L3 4, L4 151, L5 20. Bar: L3 = 100% paragraph coverage, L4 = 100% net branch coverage (a reviewed infeasible outcome in tests/equivalence/infeasible_outcomes.json, #4602, counts as covered).

L1-L3 -> L4 (30 programs, by family)

  • commarea-mismatch (17): L1 CACCSID, CAGCST, CAGMZ, CALDST, CALDSX, CATWAD, CATWSB, CAXA; L2 CAADDR, CAADSB, CACHSUB, CACHXB, CAEBCA, CAEBSB, CARTWK, CASUB; L3 CALINK
  • condition-handling (6): L1 HCCNSP, HCCWRP, HCRDST; L2 HCEOC, HCEOE, HCSUB
  • ghost-tasks (2): L3 GTREAD, GTRTRN (#7481)
  • pseudo-conversational (5): L2 PCCONF, PCIMMA, PCIMML, PCRCL; L3 PCDETL

Churn re-slices these from each new measure, so these names are a starting point; ladder_gaps.py at origin/main is the live list.

Tracked elsewhere (the 8 programs at L0)

Not translated whole, so not ladder work until their own issue moves them:

  • #6876: CALDTG, HCUNLK, GTHECHO, GTWRECV, GTWSEND
  • #5106: DBB epscsmrd
  • #5866 (named source defects): CardDemo CBEXPORT, CBIMPORT

Known blockers from the last runs

  • HC family: translator DCOUNTER VALUE -> X(8), and an IDCAMS fact (siblings for #6271)
  • HCEOC/HCEOE: terminal device (LUTYPE2) fact in the equivalence harness
  • GTREAD 37:true and GTRTRN 27:true: a harness input for started-task start options (sibling of #6271)

How to slice

One PR per family, as many programs as fit one reviewable PR, data only (case scenarios, reviewed infeasible outcomes with their reason), per the ladder-slice skill. State before/after coverage per program. Burned estates only. Evidence levels, not "proven"; the oracle is GnuCOBOL plus IBM documentation.

Follows #6072.

主要言語
Python
スター
57
フォーク
11
平均マージ
1時間 30分
マージ済み PR(30日)
971

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

squid-protocol/gitgalaxy のほかの issue

squid-protocol/gitgalaxy の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。