Metric without `labelnames` causes issues in when MULTIPROC is enabled

まず、PROMETHEUS_MULTIPROC_DIR を有効にしたシングルプロセスのスレッド構成を再現し、labelnames ありとなしで定義したメトリクスを比較します。メトリクスの初期化、作成されたデータベースファイル、exposition の出力を観察し、その後、関係する multiprocess 処理を追跡します。動作を理解し、メトリクスが一貫して報告され、欠落した labelnames を検証するかどうかについて明確な判断ができれば完了です。

Hello,
I noticed (see https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/issues/902#issuecomment-3013566209 for example ) that when

• having a metric defined without a label
• multiprocess mode is enabled (i.e. PROMETHEUS_MULTIPROC_DIR is set )
• an app has a single process

then this causes issues, and some metrics will not be reported.

It's not exactly clear to me what is happening, but an indication that something is wrong is that a prometheus db file is created at load time (i.e. when metrics are defined, before they are set).

Here's what I have in more details:

Observations in a prod application:

1. Some histogram metrics set in a threaded celery worker where PROMETHEUS_MULTIPROC_DIR are not reported
2. No such issue in pre-fork workers
3. The issue was resolved by adding the labelnames argument to a metric where it was missing (which was an histogram as well)

Other observations:

1. When starting the app, a prom db file is created for the metric that was missing labelnames (before any measurement is made)

Hypothesis:

• in a celery worker in pre-fork mode, the process creating the first db file is not the same process were metrics are set afterwards, so there is no "collision" (because of the pid suffix)
• in a celery worker in threaded mode, there is a single process creating the first db file and setting the metrics, and somehow collisions happens and some metrics are not reported

Values set at startup:

$ curl localhost:8000

# HELP test_histogram_no_label test Histogram
# TYPE test_histogram_no_label histogram
test_histogram_no_label_sum 0.0
test_histogram_no_label_bucket{le="1.0"} 0.0
test_histogram_no_label_bucket{le="2.0"} 0.0
test_histogram_no_label_bucket{le="+Inf"} 0.0
test_histogram_no_label_count 0.0

It seems to me that a simple way to address this would be to raise when a metric is defined without labelnames, as labelnames are mandatory anyway.