`InfoMetricFamily`’s `add_metric()` parameters are strangely named and should provide default values
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 技術スタック
- python
調査の方向性
prometheus_client/metrics_core.py の372行目付近にある、リンク先の InfoMetricFamily.add_metric() の実装から始め、次にそのパラメーター処理を Info と比較します。labels と value に対して想定されるデフォルト値と互換性への影響を確認します。合意された API 変更が既存の呼び出し元を壊すことなく実装され、その動作がテストでカバーされれば完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Hey.
I was looking into InfoMetricFamily’s add_metric() and I either I just don't get it or the API is a bit strange.
With an Info object I'd have done something like this:
m = prometheus_client.Info("logical_drive", "foobar", ("controller_name",
"array_name",
"logical_drive_name",
"caching",
"device",
"raid_level",
"logical_drive_label",
"multidomain_status",
"parity_initialization_status",
"status"
)
)
and then set it like:
m.labels(controller_name=controller_name, array_name=array_name, logical_drive_name=logical_drive_name,
**{n: logical_drive_properties.get(n, "") for n in (
"device",
"raid_level",
"logical_drive_label",
"multidomain_status",
"parity_initialization_status",
"status"
)
},
caching=bool_or_none_to_label_value( logical_drive_properties.get("caching") )
)
(here an example where I set some of the properties directly, and some via dict unpacking)
- It would fail if I forgot a label.
- I could use label names as attribute names, like
controller_name=rather than"controller_name"=... which is however not super important
With InfoMetricFamily seem quite a bit different:
add_metric()now has the parameterslabelsandvalue.- As far as I understand the code,
labelsare actually not labels, but values for these, namely the ones set withlabelsin the constructor ofInfoMetricFamily. - It's no longer possible to give
labelsasdict, one really needs to give them in the right order as sequence. Why doesInfoallow that but not this? - AFAICS, there is no check if exactly those labels are set, that were given in the constructor. Why over at
Infobut not here? What sense does it then even make to set the labels in the constructor? valueis misleading in so many ways. It's not the value of the metric (that is1) and even if it relates to the labels being the “value”, then it should bevalues.- It might have perhaps even been better to swap the two names... or rater use some completely different names.
Anyway... guess this can't be changed now without breaking the ABI.
However, as far as I understand the code:
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/09a5ae30602a7a81f6174dae4ba08b93ee7feed2/prometheus_client/metrics_core.py#L372
the idea is one can give labels and/or value and both are merged in a final dict of label/value pairs.... but then it would be nice if labels and value were not required.
Why not simply give them default values () respectively {}?
I could provide a patch if nothing speaks against that particular change. But the above points are IMO still problematic. Especially also that the behaviour is considerable different from Info, which is not really obvious.
Cheers,
Chris.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 4.4k
- フォーク
- 876
- 平均マージ
- 8日 4時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 1
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
prometheus/client_python のほかの issue
-
bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
prometheus/client_python#1177 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 45/100
prometheus/client_python#1210 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 58/100
prometheus/client_python#1199 · リアクション 1 件 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
prometheus/client_python#1176 ·
-
難易度 1/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 52/100
prometheus/client_python#1126 · コメント 2 件 ·
prometheus/client_python の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
essnmx good first issue
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success オープンarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·