Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

Policy for updating ICU in a release line

オープン
#679 コメント 9 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
25/100
issue の種類
ドキュメント
明瞭さ
説明が足りない
活発さ
停滞
技術スタック
javascript, node.js

調査の方向性

まず tools/icu/icu_versions.json、deps/v8/src/objects/intl-objects.h、test/parallel/test-icu-minimum-version.js を読んで、宣言されている ICU 要件と整合性チェックを理解します。完了条件は、リリースライン内での ICU 更新に関する合意済みの文書化されたポリシーが定められ、V8 のバックポートとタイムゾーン更新の扱いも含まれていることです。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Background

Started from https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38178#issuecomment-863116223 -- Node.js 14.17.1 was released with a V8 change that breaks compiling against a system ICU 65. We specify a minimum version of ICU in tools/icu/icu_versions.json and this was:

14.17.1 included https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38497 to update to ICU 69 but also included a V8 backport (https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/40df0dcb59c6769eb013d40dc0ce5de66210f3bd) and it's this backport which has broken the compilation with ICU 65 (and probably 66 going by the commit message from the original V8 commit).

We had a brief chat in today's Release WG meeting (which was recorded (link tbc)) and the agreed action was that @richardlau would see if its possible to patch V8 to restore being able to compile against ICU 65 while also still being able to compile against ICU 69. If it's not (or proves too complicated) then we'll revert the ICU 69 update in 14.x.

Policy discussion

While we have a plan for the immediate issue on 14.x in the meeting we wanted to continue to the generalized policy discussion around ICU, which will continue in this issue.

I'd like to advocate a "we won't change the minimum ICU during a major" policy -- there are some considerations.

The minimum ICU is a combination of:

We have a test to ensure consistency for the declared minimum versions. V8 backports complicate things (like in the 14.x case) as they may come from upstream V8 releases where the minimum has been moved on and may introduce incompatible code.

Fixing the minimum ICU version may prevent V8 updates from landing, for example @targos mentioned that the V8 9.2 update will also bump the minimum ICU to 69. If we enact a "no minimum version bump" that might prevent updating Node.js 16 to V8 9.2.

Another possibility/addition to fixing the minimum ICU was to not update ICU at all in a release line. Are there any potential downsides? We'd still be able to update timezone information (documentation on how to do so added in https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30364).

For completion there was also some previous discussion relating to not updating ICU in a release line related to the full-icu package (https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/483) -- that should be less of a concern for official releases of Node.js 14 onwards as those are compiled with full-icu and don't require the external full-icu npm.

cc @nodejs/releasers @AdamMajer @nodejs/i18n-api

主要言語
JavaScript
スター
4.4k
フォーク
675
平均マージ
22時間 29分
マージ済み PR(30日)
1

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

nodejs/Release のほかの issue

nodejs/Release の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

JavaScript の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。