[Bug]: WorkflowProfiler reports zero elapsed time on Windows with Python <= 3.12

オープン
#2,599 コメント 1 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 5 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
2/5
見積もり時間
1〜3時間
初心者へのやさしさ
38/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
python

調査の方向性

Start with WorkflowProfiler in profiling.py, total_runtime in run_pipeline.py, and tests/unit/indexing/test_profiling.py; check how elapsed time is measured and run the profiling tests on Windows with Python 3.11 or 3.12. Done means short workflows report positive elapsed time and pipeline runtime remains monotonic. The issue author says a fix and regression test are ready and that they plan to open a pull request, so check for work already underway before starting.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Describe the bug

WorkflowProfiler (and the pipeline total_runtime in run_pipeline.py) measure elapsed time with time.time(). On Windows, time.time() has a 15.6 ms resolution with Python <= 3.12 (it uses GetSystemTimeAsFileTime); CPython 3.13 switched to GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime with a 1 microsecond resolution (What's New in Python 3.13 - time).

Since pyproject.toml declares requires-python = ">=3.11,<3.14" but the unit-test CI matrix only runs Python 3.13, this bug is invisible to CI and affects every Windows user on Python 3.11/3.12:

  1. context.stats.workflows[name] = profiler.metrics writes overall = 0.0 for any workflow body shorter than one scheduler tick, so stats.json reports 0 ms per workflow on Windows with Python 3.11/3.12.
  2. tests/unit/indexing/test_profiling.py::TestWorkflowProfiler::test_handles_exception_in_context fails deterministically (assert 0.0 > 0), because the test body is microsecond-scale.
  3. time.time() is also a wall clock, so NTP adjustments can make elapsed/total_runtime negative or inflated; time.perf_counter() is the documented clock for measuring elapsed durations.
Steps to reproduce

On Windows with Python 3.11 or 3.12:

uv sync --all-packages
uv run pytest tests/unit/indexing/test_profiling.py

test_handles_exception_in_context fails with assert 0.0 > 0 on both 3.11.15 and 3.12.4 (verified: 11/11 pytest runs across both versions). A 300-iteration measurement of the exact try/with/raise block used by the test reports 298/300 zero elapsed values (99.3%), median 0.0, max 1.0 ms. The same test passes on Python 3.13 (3/3), which is exactly why the CI matrix (Python 3.13 only x ubuntu/windows) stays green while the supported versions fail.

Minimal clock probe on Windows, Python 3.12.4:

import time
zero = sum(
    (lambda t0: ([0] * 1000, time.time() - t0)[1] == 0.0)(time.time())
    for _ in range(200)
)
# -> 200/200 zero samples for a microsecond-scale body
Expected Behavior

WorkflowProfiler.overall and pipeline.total_runtime must be positive and monotonic regardless of Python version or OS. Elapsed-time measurement should use time.perf_counter() (high-resolution monotonic clock), per the Python docs recommendation for benchmarking.

GraphRAG Config Used

Not config-dependent; reproducible with the unit test suite alone.

Logs and screenshots
FAILED tests/unit/indexing/test_profiling.py::TestWorkflowProfiler::test_handles_exception_in_context - assert 0.0 > 0
 +  where 0.0 = WorkflowMetrics(overall=0.0, peak_memory_bytes=8480, memory_delta_bytes=8480, tracemalloc_overhead_bytes=1104).overall
Additional Information
  • GraphRAG Version: main (5faaaf4f5, post-3.3.0)
  • Operating System: Windows 11 (24H2, x64)
  • Python Version: 3.11.15, 3.12.4 (failing), 3.13.x (passing)
  • Related Issues: none found for this failure mode

I have a minimal fix ready (time.perf_counter() in profiling.py + run_pipeline.py, plus a regression test guarding positive elapsed time for sub-tick bodies) and will open a PR referencing this issue.

主要言語
Python
スター
36.6k
フォーク
3.9k
平均マージ
4日 11時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
1

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

microsoft/graphrag のほかの issue

microsoft/graphrag の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。