i2_s AVX2 GEMM folds the int16 accumulator 10x more often than its own bound requires (7.5% measured)

オープン
#628 コメント 3 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
初心者へのやさしさ
55/100
issue の種類
リファクタリング
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
cpp
領域
performance

調査の方向性

ggml/src/ggml-cpu/llamafile/sgemm.cpp の non-VNNI tinyBLAS_I2S_AVX::gemm パスから始め、次に ggml/src/ggml-cpu/ggml-cpu-i2s.c の ggml_gemm_i2_i8_s と比較します。ggml/src/ggml-cpu/arch/x86/quants.c の TQ2_0 の処理を読み、non-VNNI パスの前後でベンチマークを実行します。完了の条件は、両方の箇所で安全な int16 folding を遅延させ、VNNI の動作や perplexity を変更しないことです。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Summary

tinyBLAS_I2S_AVX::gemm folds its int16 accumulator into int32 once per
128-weight block. Its own operands license once per ten. Deferring the fold
is worth a measured 7.5 % on the dispatched path, with perplexity unchanged.

This is the path that actually runs: on a default build the per-row vec_dot is
never called (calls=0 sgemm=52068 from the kernel's own counters), so the
saving is on the hot path rather than a fallback.

The bound, from the kernel's own operands

ggml/src/ggml-cpu/llamafile/sgemm.cpp, non-VNNI branch:

__m256i d0 = _mm256_maddubs_epi16(a_vals[r][0], b0);
__m256i d1 = _mm256_maddubs_epi16(a_vals[r][1], b1);
__m256i d2 = _mm256_maddubs_epi16(a_vals[r][2], b2);
__m256i d3 = _mm256_maddubs_epi16(a_vals[r][3], b3);
__m256i sum = _mm256_add_epi16(_mm256_add_epi16(d0, d1),
                               _mm256_add_epi16(d2, d3));
acc[r][c] = _mm256_add_epi32(acc[r][c],
                             _mm256_madd_epi16(sum, one16));   // every block

Codes are masked to 0..3 (the lut comment a few lines above says so) and
activations are int8, so one vpmaddubsw lane takes two products of at most
3 * 127:

per lane, per plane      2 * 3 * 127 = 762
four planes per block    4 *     762 = 3048
safe fold interval       floor(32767 / 3048) = 10 blocks

With the codes an encoder actually emits (0..2; code 3 measured absent in
2,084,044,800 weights of BitNet-b1.58-2B-4T) the bound is 16. Ten is the
conservative figure and is what I measured against.

Measurement

Ryzen 5 3600 (Zen 2, AVX2, no VNNI), same binary, same session, mean of three:

folding every block   10,254,922,296 cycles
folding every ten      9,488,166,828 cycles
difference                      7.5 %

llama-perplexity over the same corpus is identical between the two builds, so
this is a cost and not a trade.

Scope

  • Non-VNNI only. The __AVXVNNI__ / __AVX512VNNI__ branch above uses
    _mm256_dpbusd_epi32, which accumulates straight to int32; there is no fold
    to amortise and nothing to gain there.
  • A second site has the same shape and I have not benchmarked it:
    ggml/src/ggml-cpu/ggml-cpu-i2s.c, in ggml_gemm_i2_i8_s, builds the same
    sum16 from four maddubs and folds it per block. A fix should probably
    cover both.

Suggested shape of a fix

Hoist the madd_epi16 out of the block loop and run an int16 accumulator for
up to ten blocks, folding at the boundary and at the tail. Upstream ggml does
exactly this for its own ternary types and documents the reasoning in
ggml/src/ggml-cpu/arch/x86/quants.cTQ2_0 carries the comment
// 16-bit sums, because 256*127 still fits. That is the idiom this kernel is
missing, and the best reference for the change.

Provenance

Found while measuring this kernel as a baseline for unrelated work. The 7.5 %
figure, the bound derivation and the calls=0 sgemm=52068 dispatch counts are
reproducible from https://github.com/purpleskulll/bitnet-t5bresults/i2s_fold_interval.txt
carries the run. I have no patch to offer that I have tested against your CI;
happy to prepare one if the direction is welcome.

I searched issues and PRs for fold, accumulator, int16, tinyBLAS_I2S,
maddubs and madd_epi16 before opening this and found nothing covering it.
#259 is the nearest neighbour and is a different kernel and a different idea.

主要言語
C++
スター
40.3k
フォーク
3.7k
PR マージ指標
30日以内にマージされた PR はありません

コントリビューションガイド

このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

microsoft/BitNet のほかの issue

microsoft/BitNet の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

C++ の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。