Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

[Task][RFC]: Qualify the integrated benchmark study upload and dashboard contract

オープン
#5,203 コメント 2 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
初心者へのやさしさ
38/100
issue の種類
機能追加
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
python, typescript

調査の方向性

Start with the linked RFC, then inspect study_projection.py, benchmark_study.py, and benchmark-study-page.tsx to map its acceptance criteria to the existing contract, CLI, and dashboard. Exercise the installed or source CLI and actual dashboard as the issue requires. Done means reporting the integrated revision and passed, failed, and untested evidence, reconciling the delivery checkpoint, and identifying any remaining gates; close the accepted scope only if the v0 criteria are satisfied.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

direction/architecture-evolution help wanted

Outcome / 目标

验收 benchmark study 上传、回读与看板完整链路。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S11/S12, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

The contract/reducers, local upload CLI and read-only dashboard already exist; #3878 binds case insights to terminal runs. Treat this as integrated acceptance and current-checkpoint reconciliation, not a new dashboard or uploader.

Work remaining

  • Map RFC acceptance to the shipped CLI → local upload/readback → derived campaign/arm/case/run views and close any evidenced integration gaps.
  • Reconcile the RFC delivery checkpoint with that evidence. If every v0 criterion is already satisfied, close with evidence rather than inventing features.

Ownership and ongoing work

Reuse #3243 and existing benchmark-toolkit owners. PR #4439 is a separate evaluation program, not work to duplicate here. External sink transport requires its own existing authorization and lifecycle.

Contribution route: available for a bounded proposal/PR within this RFC. Name the intended milestone and exact files in a claim comment so simultaneous contributors do not duplicate work.

Acceptance

  • Simple and factorized synthetic studies round-trip without losing countability, metric, effort, fidelity or provenance; denominators and provisional status remain visible.
  • Replay/supersession, duplicate manifests, invalid identity, unknown record kind and forbidden evidence fail or reconcile according to the existing contract.
  • Exercise the installed/source CLI and actual dashboard; no new scoring, real benchmark jobs, remote upload or leaderboard submission.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

主要言語
Python
スター
6.2k
フォーク
596
平均マージ
6時間 44分
マージ済み PR(30日)
915

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

loopx-project/loopx のほかの issue

loopx-project/loopx の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。