Expose structured observability when Agent context compaction rewrites history
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 48/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 領域
- ai, backend, observability
調査の方向性
Start at the existing TieredCompaction capability and the session snapshot path that persists rewritten history. Trace how a compaction result can be identified as an actual rewrite, then check existing server-side logging and tests around agent runs. Done means a delegated compaction operation emits the proposed fields only when history changes, without altering compaction behavior or public APIs.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Self Checks
- I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy.
- I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
- I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed.
- Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.
1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.
When an Agent run approaches its configured context budget, TieredCompaction may rewrite the message history before the next model request. The rewritten history can then be persisted in the session snapshot.
From an operator's perspective, this creates a debugging challenge: the history may become shorter or be summarized without a corresponding runtime signal. It is difficult to answer whether compaction happened, what the context size was before and after, or whether a later behavioral change was related to context rewriting.
Today, this behavior can only be inferred indirectly by comparing history shapes or by reading the compaction implementation. A structured runtime signal would make production diagnosis and testing much easier.
2. Additional context or comments
A possible low-impact direction would be to wrap the existing TieredCompaction capability with an observability adapter. The adapter would delegate to the original compaction implementation unchanged and emit a server-side log only when the history is actually rewritten.
Useful fields could include:
run_idtarget_tokensbefore_message_countafter_message_countbefore_estimated_tokensafter_estimated_tokenstier, which may initially beunknownat the top-level compaction boundary
This would not change compaction triggering, token estimation, history retention behavior, or public APIs. It would only improve diagnosability. A UI-facing event can be considered separately if maintainers think it is useful.
3. Can you help us with this feature?
- I am interested in contributing to this feature.
- 主要言語
- TypeScript
- スター
- 157k
- フォーク
- 24.7k
- 平均マージ
- 22時間 32分
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 611
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
langgenius/dify のほかの issue
-
Annotation Reply: a stored score threshold of 0.0 is silently replaced with 1, disabling the feature オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
langgenius/dify#42639 · コメント 1 件 · リアクション 1 件 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
langgenius/dify#42468 · コメント 1 件 · リアクション 1 件 ·
-
🐞 bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 86/100
langgenius/dify#42446 · リアクション 1 件 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
langgenius/dify#42355 · コメント 1 件 · リアクション 1 件 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
langgenius/dify#42350 · コメント 1 件 · リアクション 1 件 ·
langgenius/dify の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
calcite-components needs triage refactor
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
Esri/calcite-design-system#15203 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 91/100
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 95/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
Automattic/studio#4908 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100