Cold resume can replay undecryptable encrypted reasoning without a safe fallback
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- java
調査の方向性
Issue に記載された決定論的な provider fixture の再現を使い、replay のシリアライズ、保留中の turn の状態、side-effect の順序付けを担う runtime パスから着手します。構造化された decrypt/parse エラーによって、ユーザーイベントを重複させずに side-effect 前のアトミックな retry を 1 回実行でき、その後の resume では無効化されたプレフィックスを回避し、無関係なエラーや繰り返し発生するエラーは terminal のままとなれば完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Summary
When a cold-resumed session preserves prior reasoning fields, the first model request can fail with HTTP 400 if the provider can no longer validate the replayed encrypted_content:
Encrypted content ... could not be decrypted or parsed.
The logical model identifier can remain unchanged while the provider's underlying deployment or encryption domain changes. The SDK currently treats this as a terminal session error. Consumers cannot atomically remove the incompatible pre-resume reasoning, retry the pending turn, and prevent the same payload from being replayed on later resumes.
This leaves consumers with two unsafe choices:
- Strip reasoning on every resume, losing reasoning continuity and prefix-cache reuse.
- Preserve reasoning on every resume, leaving the session unrecoverable when a previously valid blob becomes unverifiable.
This is related to #615, which correctly preserved encrypted_content for stateless multi-turn requests. Preservation should remain the normal path, with a bounded recovery path for blobs that a provider can no longer verify.
Versions and configuration
- Reproduced with the resume behavior in
@github/copilotCLI 1.0.78. - The same relevant behavior is present in CLI 1.0.73.
- Prior reasoning is preserved on resume by setting
COPILOT_STRIP_REASONING_ON_RESUME=false. - The provider uses a stable logical model name but may route requests across compatible model deployments.
Reproduction
A provider fixture can reproduce the failure deterministically:
- Create a session with a reasoning model.
- Complete a turn whose assistant reasoning contains
encrypted_content. - Disconnect and cold-resume the session with reasoning preservation enabled.
- Send the next user message.
- Have the provider reject the replayed blob with HTTP 400 and the decrypt/parse error above.
Actual behavior
The resumed turn fails terminally. A generic consumer retry reuses the same incompatible history. The public SDK API does not provide an atomic way to sanitize the resumed prefix without risking a duplicate user event or repeated tool side effects.
Expected behavior
The SDK should preserve reasoning by default, but recover safely when the first post-resume call proves that prior encrypted reasoning is incompatible.
One possible design is a resume policy such as preserveWithStripFallback:
- Match only the structured HTTP 400 decrypt/parse failure, not every encrypted-content or invalid-request error.
- Recover only before assistant output or tool execution has started.
- Atomically strip incompatible pre-resume opaque reasoning and retry the same pending turn once.
- Do not append the user event twice.
- Persist an invalidation cutoff or generation so later resumes do not replay the poisoned prefix.
- Continue preserving reasoning generated after recovery.
- If available, use an opaque provider-issued verification-domain identity to avoid replay proactively when compatibility does not match.
Unrelated errors, failures after side effects, and a failed recovery attempt should remain terminal. The retry must never loop.
Why this belongs in the runtime
The runtime owns replay serialization, pending-turn state, and side-effect ordering. Handling this outside the SDK cannot reliably distinguish a safe first-call recovery point or rewrite session history atomically.
This recovery keeps the cache and multi-turn reasoning benefit for healthy resumes. Only a session with incompatible ciphertext loses its old hidden-reasoning prefix once, after which newly generated reasoning can be preserved normally.
- 主要言語
- Java
- スター
- 10.5k
- フォーク
- 1.5k
- 平均マージ
- 1日 9時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 130
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
github/copilot-sdk のほかの issue
-
agentic-workflows
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2760 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2759 ·
-
documentation
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 85/100
github/copilot-sdk#2758 ·
-
agentic-workflows
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
github/copilot-sdk#2709 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
github/copilot-sdk#2673 ·
github/copilot-sdk の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
area/plugin
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
kestra-io/plugin-kestra#190 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
google-ai-edge/LiteRT-LM#3739 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
integra-team-red/meet-map#249 ·
-
[Studio][Bug] Cancelled create-user dialog keeps the password and admin switch for the next attempt オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#5064 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
wso2/dpdp-accelerator#287 ·