Cloudflare Tunnel: docs imply top-level originRequest.access applies to all ingress rules, but cloudflared silently ignores it
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
@nikitacano がすでに取り組んでいます。
2026年7月10日 から。
評価
この issue はまだ評価されていません。
説明
Which pages are affected?
- https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/networks/connectors/cloudflare-tunnel/do-more-with-tunnels/local-management/configuration-file/#origin-configuration
(source:src/content/partials/cloudflare-one/tunnel/locally-managed/configuration-file.mdx) - https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/networks/connectors/cloudflare-tunnel/configure-tunnels/origin-parameters/#access-settings
(source:src/content/partials/cloudflare-one/tunnel/origin-parameters.mdx)
What is wrong?
The "Origin configuration" section teaches that a top-level originRequest block sets defaults for all ingress rules, and the access parameter page says to "add the following rule to originRequest" without qualifying where. Following the two pages together, a reasonable reading is that this protects every service behind the tunnel:
originRequest:
access:
required: true
teamName: <team>
audTag:
- <aud>
ingress:
- hostname: app.example.com
service: http://localhost:8000
- service: http_status:404
In reality cloudflared silently ignores a top-level access block. The config validates, no warning is logged, and unauthenticated traffic is forwarded to the origin. The JWT validation middleware is only attached when the access block sits under an individual ingress rule: validateIngress in ingress/ingress.go reads the raw per-rule r.OriginRequest.Access, not the merged defaults (the merge in ingress/config.go copies the top-level block, but its result is never consulted for middleware attachment).
Verified on cloudflared 2026.7.1 with an A/B test against the same hostname (no Access app on the hostname, so no JWT on any request): top-level block returned 200 from the origin; the identical block moved under the ingress rule returned 403 from cloudflared.
This is a known cloudflared behaviour: cloudflare/cloudflared#784 (open since 2022) reports it, and a maintainer described it as "largely intended" because Access rules are tied to hostnames. The docs have not been updated to match, which matters because the failure mode is a security control that users believe is active but is not (see also the last comment on that issue).
Suggested fix
- In the configuration-file partial's "Origin configuration" section, note that
accessis an exception to top-level inheritance and must be set on each ingress rule. - In the origin-parameters partial's
accesssection, state explicitly that the block must be placed underoriginRequestof each individual ingress rule, and that a top-level block is not enforced.
- 主要言語
- MDX
- スター
- 5.4k
- フォーク
- 17.3k
- 平均マージ
- 1日 20時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 525
環境構築
- Dockerfile・Docker Compose ファイルなし
- プルリクエストのテンプレートあり
- コントリビューションガイドを読む
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
cloudflare/cloudflare-docs のほかの issue
-
BIMI records for DNS対応中かも @ayushkrsingh946 が 5 日前に担当しました。 オープンcontent:new documentation effort:very-high
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
cloudflare/cloudflare-docs#34744 · コメント 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
effort:medium engineering
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
cloudflare/cloudflare-docs#34619 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
Incorrect local link is used in Stream documentation対応中かも @AiAlchemist0 が 12 日前に担当しました。 オープンeffort:medium engineering
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
cloudflare/cloudflare-docs#34497 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
effort:medium engineering
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
cloudflare/cloudflare-docs#34464 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
content:edit documentation effort:high
難易度 1/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 67/100
cloudflare/cloudflare-docs#34428 · コメント 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信