Windows ARM64 (PE) `ontop_fcontext`: epilog deallocates 0xc0 of the 0xd0 bytes the prolog allocates — 16-byte SP skew, breaks /GS and SEH-based unwind on resume

src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armasm.asm と src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armclang.S の指定された行にあるエピローグから始め、プロローグおよび修正済みの jump_fcontext 実装と比較してください。利用可能であれば、Windows ARM64 環境で libs/context/test をビルドまたは実行してください。両方の PE 実装が issue に記載されたフレームサイズを一貫して復元すれば完了です。

Summary

Both PE-target ARM64 assembly implementations of ontop_fcontext
(src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armasm.asm, MSVC ARMASM64 syntax, and
src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armclang.S, Clang/GAS syntax) have an asymmetric
prolog/epilog: the prolog reserves 0xd0 (208) bytes of stack, but the epilog releases
only 0xc0 (192) before tail-jumping into the ontop-function. The missing 0x10 (16)
bytes are never reclaimed, so sp sits 16 bytes below where it should be for the
remainder of the resumed context's execution.

Confirmed present, byte-for-byte, on develop @ d2142b6925… (current HEAD as of this
report). Confirmed not present in either of the two structurally analogous,
already-correct siblings on the same target:

• src/asm/jump_arm64_aapcs_pe_armasm.asm — symmetric, 0xd0/0xd0.
• src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_elf_gas.S (the ELF/GAS target's ontop_fcontext) —
  symmetric, 0xb0/0xb0 (smaller frame: no Windows TEB/TIB save/restore, but internally
  consistent).

This is a structural, input-independent skew — every invocation of the ontop path on
Windows ARM64 hits it, not a data-dependent corruption.

Where it bites: /GS and SEH-based unwind, downstream

ontop_fcontext is reached via a tail-jump (ret x2, not a call), and the
ontop-function it jumps to eventually returns via the target context's own restored
LR, back into that target's original suspended call site — a site that expects sp
restored to its pre-suspend value, exactly as the symmetric jump_fcontext epilog would
leave it. The asymmetric ontop_fcontext epilog leaves sp 16 bytes below that value
instead, for the remaining lifetime of the resumed frame.

Any caller built with /GS (MSVC, on by default) or -fstack-protector-all (Clang) that
stores a stack cookie in a frame which gets resumed via this path will have its
__security_check_cookie read the wrong stack slot on that frame's own exit, and fail
fast with STATUS_STACK_BUFFER_OVERRUN (0xc0000409) — a __fastfail, not a catchable
SEH/C++ exception. A related failure mode hits boost::context::fiber's
forced_unwind-driven teardown (which also uses the ontop path to inject an unwind
marker into the target context): Windows' _CxxFrameHandler3 walks frames using static
.pdata/.xdata unwind metadata that encodes each frame's expected SP delta, and a
frame that's silently 16 bytes off from that expectation can make the unwinder
misidentify frame boundaries mid-walk.

We hit this downstream, three vendoring hops removed from this repo: hermes-windows
(Microsoft's Windows fork of Meta's Hermes JS engine, used by react-native-windows)
vendors boost_1_86_0 wholesale, including this exact file pair, unmodified. On Windows
ARM64, running Hermes' interpreter on a custom fiber stack, this produces a deterministic
crash in a production React Native app under load (root-caused from 8 crash dumps across
2 engine builds and 4 ASLR bases — all module-relative-identical, confirming the
structural nature of the bug). Full writeup and a downstream fix for hermes-windows:
the companion downstream fix for hermes-windows (link added below once posted).

Anyone else running boost::context::fiber (or anything built on it — Boost.Fiber,
Boost.Coroutine2) on Windows ARM64 under /GS or -fstack-protector-all, exercising the
ontop/resume_with/fiber-teardown path under load, is exposed to the same defect.

History: where this was introduced

The asymmetry was introduced in
#201 "Windows arm64 fcontext support"
(merged 2022-07-05), specifically in commit abf8e04e23cf05a499594e674d1c90db39117662
("Spport Windows arm64 cpp exception", 2022-06-26). That commit extended the frame from
0xb0 to 0xd0 to save/restore four TEB fields (TeStackBase, TeStackLimit,
TeDeallocationStack, TeFiberData) so C++ exception unwinding sees a consistent TIB
across a fiber switch — a good and necessary change. It correctly rewired every other
offset in the function (the PC-save slot moved 0xa0→0xc0, the new TIB fields landed
at 0xa0/0xb0, the prolog's sub moved 0xb0→0xd0) but only bumped the epilog's
add from 0xb0 to 0xc0 — a 0x10 step, not the 0x20 step every other offset in
the same commit got. The diff (against
src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armasm.asm) makes the off-by-one-constant plain:

 ontop_fcontext proc BOOST_CONTEXT_EXPORT
     ; prepare stack for GP + FPU
-    sub  sp, sp, #0xb0
+    sub  sp, sp, #0xd0
     ...
     ; save LR as PC
-    str  x30, [sp, #0xa0]
+    str  x30, [sp, #0xc0]
+
+    ; save current stack base and limit
+    ldp  x5,  x6,  [x18, #0x08]
+    stp  x5,  x6,  [sp, #0xa0]
+    ; save current fiber data and deallocation stack
+    ldr  x5, [x18, #0x1478]
+    ldr  x6, [x18, #0x20]
+    stp  x5,  x6,  [sp, #0xb0]
     ...
+    ; restore stack base and limit
+    ldp  x5,  x6,  [sp, #0xa0]
+    stp  x5,  x6,  [x18, #0x08]
+    ; restore fiber data and deallocation stack
+    ldp  x5,  x6,  [sp, #0xb0]
+    str  x5, [x18, #0x1478]
+    str  x6, [x18, #0x20]
     ...
     ; skip pc
     ; restore stack from GP + FPU
-    add  sp, sp, #0xb0
+    add  sp, sp, #0xc0

A second commit, e878e8edb2b2… ("Convert ARM64 armasm to armclang for Windows clang",
2024-06-19), mechanically transcribed this file's ARMASM64 syntax into the Clang/GAS
syntax now at src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armclang.S, carrying the same 0x10
shortfall forward verbatim into the second file. Neither commit touched
jump_fcontext's analogous epilog, which is why it stayed correct throughout.

Proposed fix

Make the epilog symmetric with the prolog (add sp, sp, #0xd0) in both files, matching
jump_fcontext on the same target and ontop_fcontext on the ELF target. No other
register logic changes.

--- a/src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armasm.asm
+++ b/src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armasm.asm
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ ontop_fcontext proc BOOST_CONTEXT_EXPORT

     ; skip pc
     ; restore stack from GP + FPU
-    add  sp, sp, #0xc0
+    add  sp, sp, #0xd0

     ; jump to ontop-function
     ret x2

--- a/src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armclang.S
+++ b/src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armclang.S
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ ontop_fcontext:

     // skip pc
     // restore stack from GP + FPU
-    add  sp, sp, #0xc0
+    add  sp, sp, #0xd0

     // jump to ontop-function
     ret x2

(Exact line numbers as of develop @ d2142b6925…: src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armasm.asm
prolog at line 65, epilog at line 127; src/asm/ontop_arm64_aapcs_pe_armclang.S prolog
at line 71, epilog at line 133.)

Validation status

• Root cause: confirmed by direct inspection of develop HEAD (both files, both
  currently 0xd0/0xc0) and by disassembly of a downstream production crash (8 dumps,
  hermes-windows on Windows ARM64 — see linked report above). The skew is structural and
  input-independent: it does not depend on data, timing, or heap state, only on whether
  the ontop path is taken.
• Fix: validated by symmetry against the two already-correct sibling implementations in
  this same file family (jump_fcontext PE variant, ontop_fcontext ELF variant), and
  independently against a downstream engine that carries an identical fix — see the
  linked hermes-windows PR for that fix's own validation status (empirical repro or
  build+inspection, whichever applies at time of reading).
• We have not run this repo's own test suite (libs/context/test) against the fix —
  we don't have a boost ARM64-on-Windows test harness in our environment. If maintainers
  want a PR rather than (or in addition to) this issue, we're happy to open one with the
  diff above; it's a minimal, mechanical, two-line change and should be straightforward
  to verify against existing Boost.Context/Boost.Fiber ARM64 CI if one exists.