Scan planning needs iceberg_bundle (and Arrow C++) only for the Avro reader
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 12/100
- issue の種類
- リファクタリング
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- cpp
- 領域
- build-system, data
調査の方向性
This is a design proposal, so start by settling with maintainers whether the split is wanted. Read the Arrow C++ uses under src/iceberg/avro/ (the reader builders, the writer's array and decimal handling, and avro_schema_util.cc's arrow::DecimalType::DecimalSize call) and the helpers in the bundle's iceberg/arrow/ directory. Compare them with how ManifestReader and ManifestEntryAdapter already use nanoarrow. Done would mean an agreed plan for an Arrow-free iceberg_avro target, not a patch.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
We are building an Iceberg connector for Axiom, which runs on Velox. We plan to use iceberg-cpp for the REST catalog and for scan planning, and Velox reads the data files.
To plan a scan, ManifestReader reads the manifest list and the manifests, which are Avro files. It gets the reader from ReaderFactoryRegistry for FileFormatType::kAvro, and the only Avro reader is the one iceberg::avro::RegisterAll() registers from iceberg_bundle. The bundle also links Arrow C++ and Parquet. The other libraries we use, iceberg, iceberg_rest and iceberg_data, have no Arrow C++ in them, they contain no arrow:: symbols. Without the bundle, though, every scan fails with Missing reader factory for file format: avro. So we have to link Arrow C++ just to read manifests.
For us that means two Arrow versions in one process. Velox pins Arrow 18.0.0 and iceberg-cpp builds Arrow 25.0.0. They define the same symbols with different class layouts, and code compiled against one version ends up calling the other. We hit this with arrow::DictionaryArray, which is 72 bytes in Arrow 18 and 80 bytes in Arrow 25 (Arrow 25 added a std::once_flag member). Velox's Parquet writer is compiled against Arrow 18 and allocates 72 bytes for one, but the constructor that runs is Arrow 25's, and it writes the new member 8 bytes past the end of the object. The process then crashes later, in some unrelated malloc.
Right now we work around this by building iceberg-cpp and its Arrow into a separate shared library, with per-platform linker flags that hide every Arrow symbol and a build-time check that none leak out. It works, but it's fragile, and the Avro reader is the only reason we need it.
The Avro code doesn’t need Arrow C++ at its interface, and the public Avro headers don’t include it. The reader returns ArrowArray and ArrowSchema C structs, the writer takes an ArrowArray, and both open files through FileIO. The core already builds and parses Arrow data with nanoarrow, for example in ManifestEntryAdapter and ManifestReader.
Inside src/iceberg/avro/, Arrow C++ is only an implementation detail, and each use of it can be replaced with something Arrow-free. The reader builds its output with Arrow C++ builders and the writer reads its input as Arrow C++ arrays, decimals and default values included; nanoarrow, which the core already uses, can do both. Files are read and written through Arrow IO streams, which FileIO’s own streams can replace. A couple of small helpers come from the bundle’s iceberg/arrow/ directory and could move to the core. The field-id projection (Project and MakeAvroNodeWithFieldIds) doesn’t use Arrow C++ at all, and the only Arrow call in avro_schema_util.cc is arrow::DecimalType::DecimalSize, a byte-width calculation that is easy to do without Arrow.
Would you be open to rewriting the Avro reader and writer on nanoarrow and moving them into their own library, say iceberg_avro, that depends only on the core and avro-cpp? iceberg_bundle would link it, so nothing changes for people who use the bundle. Engines like us could then link iceberg, iceberg_rest, iceberg_data and iceberg_avro, with only one Arrow in the process.
Thank you.
- 主要言語
- C++
- スター
- 228
- フォーク
- 136
- 平均マージ
- 5日 19時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 53
環境構築
このプロジェクトには開発コンテナ、Dockerfile、コントリビューションガイドがありません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
apache/iceberg-cpp のほかの issue
-
bug: TableMetadataBuilder::RemoveSchemas leaves removed ids in the schema index対応中かも @LuciferYang が 4 日前に担当しました。 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
apache/iceberg-cpp#1011 ·
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信
-
bug: gzip table metadata is neither written nor detected as gzip対応中かも @LuciferYang が 4 日前に担当しました。 オープン
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 66/100
apache/iceberg-cpp#1013 ·
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
apache/iceberg-cpp#1000 · コメント 2 件 · リアクション 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 8/100
apache/iceberg-cpp#988 · コメント 2 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 20/100
apache/iceberg-cpp#959 · コメント 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信
apache/iceberg-cpp の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
content good first issue
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 95/100
cpinitiative/usaco-guide#6699 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
codepointerapp/codepointer#231 ·
-
enhancement source/qq
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
metasequoiaime/msime-windows#1054 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
amnezia-vpn/amnezia-client#3297 · コメント 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信