User Stories for Interface / Feature Design and Documentation
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100
調査の方向性
ファイル、テスト、エントリポイントは指定されていません。まず提案されている例と現在のDataFusion Pythonの機能を確認し、その後、コントリビューターのユースケースとインターフェース要件を整理します。完了条件は、DataFrame操作とドキュメントについて、明確化され優先順位付けされた方向性を示すことです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
As discussed in the rust arrow chat, this is a place to chart a way forward by collecting examples of both what people do in other libraries and what they want to do but can't do easily with current tools. In addition to clarifying Python interface requirements, I hope it provides fodder for lower-level functions, encourages knowledgeable folks to explain how to do things (which can then get documented), and clarifies what is important to what types of people and why. There's a daunting amount of work, but the opportunity and potential are tremendous.
For contributors, I'd like to structure this roughly as follows:
- If it's your first post in this thread, a brief description of your background and the types of work you've done/do.
- Examples of operations on data you think are important. Broadly of the form "I can do X in library Y with code sample Z". If it's something that you like, consider saying why. If you don't like it, explain how it could be easier or clearer.
- Examples of things you frequently do but have had to implement yourself and think should be considered for core operations.
- OPTIONALLY: Thoughts you have on what's important to a good data frame API in a dynamic language.
OK, now it's my turn to start.
My background is in statistics, machine learning, and data science. Most of what I do is focused on modeling and analyzing data, though I've done a good bit of pipeline and data processing/cleaning too. As such, I place a premium on in-memory interactive work (notebooks, rmarkdown, etc.). Partly because of this, I think a lot of tools mistake verboseness for clarity, and striving for conciseness often helps readability rather than hurting it if done correctly.
I have the most experience with R's data.table but I've also used dplyr, polars, pandas, and Julia. So here's sampling of a few things I would want in a dataframe library in no particular order.
- Here's an example in
data.tablethat shows features I think are both good and bad.
> dt1 = data.table(t = 1:5, v = 5:1)
> dt2 = data.table(start = c(1, 4), end = c(3, 10), x = c("a", "b"))
> dt1[dt2, x := i.x, on = .(t >= start, t < end)]
> dt1
t v x
1: 1 5 a
2: 2 4 a
3: 3 3 <NA>
4: 4 2 b
5: 5 1 b
First, I find non-equi joins, especially range joins incredibly useful. They're common in SQL but a lot of dataframe libraries don't have them. data.table also makes it easy to update in place with the := operator, which can be used to create new columns as well as update existing ones. As I understand it, arrow strives for immutability, but at the same time, it won't make copies of the whole frame if it doesn't have to, so maybe this is less of an issue. However, I do like the idea of using a join like this to explicitly tag/annotate another table.
-
Reshaping data. These functions transform data between "wide" to "long" (sometimes known as "tidy") formats. Sometimes they go by
cast/meltorpivotand there's even a simpletransposefunction in a lot of packages. It doesn't seem common in database-world, but to me reshaping in-memory data is important for a lot of use cases. -
Rolling groupbys. Both Pandas and Polars have pretty good support for creating overlapping groups and aggregating over them. These are commonly used for time series analysis. I also think the ability to define groups not just by a number of rows, but by a potentially variable-width lookback (like, at most 1 month before the current date) is useful. Polars does a pretty good job at this, and I think Pandas might too.
Alright, that's a few to get started and this is long enough as it is. I'm looking forward to seeing what everyone thinks is important, their thoughts on good DataFrame API design, and what is and isn't currently possible in DataFusion.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 605
- フォーク
- 176
- 平均マージ
- 1日 23時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 8
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
apache/datafusion-python のほかの issue
-
enhancement
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
apache/datafusion-python#1757 ·
-
documentation
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
apache/datafusion-python#1726 ·
-
難易度 2/5 半日 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
apache/datafusion-python#1691 ·
-
bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
apache/datafusion-python#1644 ·
-
enhancement
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 30/100
apache/datafusion-python#1737 ·
apache/datafusion-python の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
learningequality/ricecooker#747 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
BSData/horus-heresy-3rd-edition#3171 ·
-
enhancement
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
run-llama/llama_index#23199 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
KhronosGroup/glTF-Blender-IO#2769 ·