Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

query-db refetch oracle: a window row is missing from the source Collection after a held delete is released

オープン
#2,214 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
初心者へのやさしさ
48/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
typescript
領域
database, testing

調査の方向性

Start with packages/query-db-collection/tests/refetch-ordered-prefix-oracle.test.ts and run the supplied seed and path using the reproduction command. Trace the held delete, refetch, and release through the query-db code and compare the source Collection with the ordered window after release. Done means the reproduced history satisfies the coverage law, with the relevant tests passing.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Summary

The query-db refetch oracle fails on main at bd10e564e for one random seed. The history has a held delete, two upserts, a refetch, and the release of the held delete. After it, a row sorts inside the live window, but the source Collection does not have it.

Reproduction

pnpm install
pnpm --filter @tanstack/db-ivm build
pnpm --filter @tanstack/db build
pnpm --filter @tanstack/db-sqlite-persistence-core build
cd packages/query-db-collection
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_SEED=-116668131 \
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_PATH="71:3:0:2:1:1:2:3:0:5:5:4:0:0:0:0:3:1:2:4:4:7" \
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_PROPERTY=query-db.refetch-ordered-prefix \
npx vitest run tests/refetch-ordered-prefix-oracle.test.ts

The random campaign of query-db.refetch-ordered-prefix found the seed. In my runs, approximately 1 of 3 random campaigns failed.

Shrunk counterexample

{
  "scenario": { "encoding": "cursor", "functionKey": false, "terms": 1, "orderKey": "rank", "limit": 1, "offset": 0 },
  "initial": [
    { "id": 0, "rank": 0, "marked": false },
    { "id": 1, "rank": 0, "marked": false }
  ],
  "history": [
    { "type": "hold", "kind": "delete", "id": 1 },
    { "type": "upsert", "id": 2, "rank": 0 },
    { "type": "upsert", "id": 1, "rank": 1 },
    { "type": "refetch" },
    { "type": "release" }
  ]
}

Failure

coverage after release at step 4: rows [{"id":2,"rank":2,"label":"a2"}] sort at or before the window's end but are [null] in the source Collection

The coverage law applies after the release of the held write. Every row that sorts at or before the end of the served window must then be in the source Collection. Here, row 2 sorts inside the window, but the source Collection does not contain it.

Scope

  • The failure also occurs with the live-query sources of #2194 and of its merge base, so it does not come from #2194.
  • I did not find the cause. The shrunk history has a held delete of row 1 while row 2 is inserted, row 1 moves, and a refetch runs. That points at the refetch and the release of the held write, possibly near #2206.

This issue was written by Isaac.

主要言語
TypeScript
スター
4k
フォーク
277
平均マージ
17時間 40分
マージ済み PR(30日)
223

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

TanStack/db のほかの issue

TanStack/db の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

TypeScript の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。