Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

Arbitrary code execution via eval() of a third-party model pack's train.log field in the WebUI

オープン 初心者向け
#2,866 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
2/5
見積もり時間
1〜3時間
初心者へのやさしさ
78/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
python
領域
security

調査の方向性

change_info_ 内の webui.py:1719-1726 と、webui.py:2820-2822 の ckpt_path2.change の配線を読みます。issue の悪意のある train.log とネガティブコントロールの再現を実行し、パースによって実行可能な式が拒否される一方で、有効な model-info データがセレクターを更新し続け、canary ファイルが作成されないことを確認します。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

1. Summary

RVC WebUI wires the change event of the model-path textbox to change_info_ (webui.py:2821). change_info_ reads the sidecar file train.log shipped next to the selected model, takes the last tab-separated field of the first line, and passes it straight to eval() (webui.py:1719-1726). Model packs usually come from third-party sharing (cloud drives, model sites), so this train.log is attacker-controlled untrusted input: with a completely benign .pth, a single line of log text is enough to execute arbitrary Python code with WebUI process privileges on the victim's machine.

2. Affected version / environment

Repository: RVC-Project/Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI; verification anchor: commit 81eed5e (webui.py:1715-1731 change_info_; webui.py:2821 .change wiring); latest release: tag 2.3.260718 and the current main branch (checked 2026-09-30) still contain the same code; history: tag 2.2.231006 (2023-10) already had the same eval in infer-web.py:754-761, so the flaw is at least ~2 years old; PoC environment: Docker official python:3.11-slim image (Python 3.11.16) with the project's own CPU dependency list requirments_cpu_py312.txt (gradio 3.14.0; torch 2.4.1+cpu); the WebUI listens on 0.0.0.0:7897 by default.

3. Steps to reproduce

  1. Build a model pack evil_model/ containing two files: G_23333.pth is a normal, benign small checkpoint (generated with torch.save, byte-identical to the negative control); the first line of train.log follows the project's own log format "%(asctime)s\t%(name)s\t%(levelname)s\t%(message)s" with the last field (the message slot) replaced by the Python expression (import('pathlib').Path('/out/pwned_by_rvc_train_log_eval').write_text('MBE2E-CANARY-rvc-train-log-eval-v1\n', encoding='utf-8'), {'sample_rate': '48k', 'if_f0': 1, 'version': 'v2'})[1], which first writes a canary file and then returns the model-info dict, so the UI update completes normally without any error.
  2. Start the WebUI: python webui.py --pycmd python3 --port 7897
  3. Fire the same event a real user triggers: put the path evil_model/G_23333.pth into the "Path to Model" textbox of the checkpoint-extraction section (the .change event invokes change_info_); in the PoC the project's own Gradio queue API is used (/queue/join WebSocket, same protocol as the product frontend), submitting that path with fn_index pointing at the .change listener.
  4. Observe the server filesystem: /out/pwned_by_rvc_train_log_eval now exists with content "MBE2E-CANARY-rvc-train-log-eval-v1", while the UI shows no anomaly at all.
  5. Negative control: same directory layout and byte-identical .pth, but with the last train.log field replaced by the plain dict literal {'sample_rate': '48k', 'if_f0': 1, 'version': 'v2'}; repeat step 3 — it returns 48k/1/v2 and produces no file.

4. Expected behavior / Actual behavior

Expected: train.log is untrusted data carried inside a third-party model pack; parsing its field to prefill the sample-rate/if_f0/version selectors must never execute any code from it.
Actual: the field content is evaluated by eval(); the attacker's expression runs with WebUI process privileges, and because the payload returns a legitimate info dict the UI updates silently — no error, no warning.

5. Impact

  • Full arbitrary code execution with WebUI process privileges: file read/exfiltration, persistence, weight replacement, all possible.
  • The payload hides in "log text" while the .pth stays clean, so weight-based scanning and user intuition (people only look at the weights) both miss it; the expression returns a normal dict, so nothing is surfaced to the UI.
  • The trigger (selecting/pasting a model path in the WebUI) is the unavoidable step of loading community models; no training, no GPU, no extra interaction required.

6. Suggested fix

Replace the eval() at webui.py:1719 with a constrained parser: prefer ast.literal_eval(info_str), which accepts literals only and rejects any call or name lookup; treat parse failures as "no train.log info" (fall back to the UI defaults) instead of swallowing them into a traceback; the cleaner long-term option is a JSON convention (json.dumps on the writer side), fully dropping Python literal evaluation. Also consider warning the user when a model path with a sidecar train.log is loaded for the first time.

7. Additional context

  • Vulnerable code (webui.py:1719-1726, commit 81eed5e):
info = eval(
    read_text(
        ckpt_path.replace(os.path.basename(ckpt_path), "train.log")
    )
    .strip("\n")
    .split("\n")[0]
    .split("\t")[-1]
)
sr, f0 = info["sample_rate"], info["if_f0"]
  • Event wiring (webui.py:2820-2822):
ckpt_path2.change(
    change_info_, [ckpt_path2], [sr__, if_f0__, version_1]
)

rvc-train-log-eval-poc.zip

link:

https://github.com/3em0/cve_repo/blob/main/2026/Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI_Arbitrary_Code_Execution_via_eval()_of_Sidecar_train.log_in_WebUI_change_info_.md

主要言語
Python
スター
38.9k
フォーク
5.3k
PR マージ指標
30日以内にマージされた PR はありません

環境構築

このプロジェクトには開発コンテナ、Dockerfile、コントリビューションガイドがありません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

RVC-Project/Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI のほかの issue

RVC-Project/Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。