Responses API (`/v1/responses`) and Vertex AI: model access for a multi-turn benchmark
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
調査の方向性
This is a design proposal, so start by deciding the approach rather than writing code. Read models/clients/factory.py (the _SUPPORTED_PROVIDER_TYPES check), models/clients/adapters/openai_compatible.py (where _ROUTE_CHAT is fixed to /chat/completions) and models/clients/parsing.py (where parse_assistant_message drops reasoning items). Done means a maintainer-agreed design covering routing, passed-through fields and replay of reasoning items.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Priority Level: Medium (Nice to have)
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
OpenAI models already work through the OpenAI-compatible adapter (Chat Completions). This is only about
OpenAI's other endpoint, /v1/responses, and only for multi-turn calls to reasoning models.
The benchmark below needs two things from Data Designer: the Responses API (this section), and Vertex AI
(see "Second gap: Vertex AI" below, folded in from #92).
Some evaluations send a model its own earlier reasoning back on the next turn, because models trained on
preserved thinking expect it. MindEval (Apache-2.0), a
multi-session counselling benchmark that runs on NeMo User Sim, does this for the model under test, and
User Sim now offers the same as an opt-in.
OpenAI's reasoning models return their reasoning only through the Responses API, as reasoning items
(encrypted when the call asks for include: ["reasoning.encrypted_content"] with store: false). Through
Chat Completions they return none. So through Data Designer, which reaches OpenAI-type endpoints with its
OpenAI-compatible adapter, these models can be called but their reasoning cannot be carried to the next
turn: they are evaluated without the context they would have in deployment, and their scores are not
comparable with runs that carry it.
Today MindEval works around this by calling those models through litellm's Responses bridge
(openai/responses/<model>, azure/responses/<deployment>) instead of Data Designer. Its README:
OpenAI reasoning models return it only through the Responses API: run them as
azure/responses/<deployment>(oropenai/responses/<model>) with
--counselor_params '{"include": ["reasoning.encrypted_content"], "store": false}'.
Describe the solution you'd like
A way for a Data Designer model to use the Responses API and hand back what is needed to continue the
conversation, for example:
- a provider or endpoint option that sends a model's calls to
/v1/responses(OpenAI and Azure OpenAI) - request fields passed through (
include,store,reasoning) - the reasoning items returned on the response, and accepted again on the earlier assistant turns of the
next request, so a caller can replay them
If there is already a way to do this in Data Designer, a pointer would be just as good, which is why
this is filed as a question as much as a request.
Describe alternatives you've considered
- Chat Completions only: works, but the reasoning is lost between turns (the problem above).
- litellm's Responses bridge outside Data Designer: what MindEval does now. It works, but those calls
bypass Data Designer's model layer, so User Sim's accounting, retries and model configuration don't
apply to them. - A proxy in front of Data Designer (e.g. a LiteLLM proxy translating
/chat/completionsto
/responses): gets the call through, but the reasoning items come back as an extra field that Data
Designer's parser drops, and there is no way to send them back on the next turn. previous_response_idwithstore: true: keeps the reasoning on OpenAI's side instead of
carrying it. Not usable where data must not be stored, and it ties each turn to one provider session.
Agent Investigation
Checked on main (2026-10-14) and in 0.9.4:
models/clients/factory.py:_SUPPORTED_PROVIDER_TYPES = ("openai", "anthropic"); any other
provider type raises. Plugins can't add a model client (plugin types: column generator, seed reader,
processor).models/clients/adapters/openai_compatible.py: chat calls always post to_ROUTE_CHAT = "/chat/completions"; no other route for chat.models/clients/parsing.py:parse_assistant_messagekeepscontent,reasoning_content(text),
tool_callsand images; other message fields, such as reasoning items, are dropped.- No existing issue found ("responses api", "encrypted_content", "/v1/responses").
- In MindEval (
mindeval/llm.py), litellm returns the items asreasoning_items(or under
provider_specific_fields) on the message; the benchmark stores them with the turn and sends them back
on that turn next time (mindeval/session.py,CARRIED = ("reasoning_content", "thinking_blocks", "reasoning_items")).
Second gap: Vertex AI
The same benchmark uses Claude and Gemini on Vertex AI, today through litellm's vertex_ai/ provider,
outside Data Designer's model layer. What blocks it, as far as we can see in the code (main):
- Claude on Vertex (per Google Cloud's API docs) speaks the Anthropic Messages format, but at
…/publishers/anthropic/models/{model}:rawPredict, with the model in the URL,
anthropic_version: "vertex-2023-10-16"in the body, and a Google access token. The Anthropic adapter
(models/clients/adapters/anthropic.py) posts to{endpoint}/v1/messageswithx-api-keyand the
model in the body. - Gemini on Vertex works through Vertex's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, but authenticates with a Google
access token that expires after about an hour, while a provider's key is resolved once when the client
is built (models/clients/factory.py,_resolve_api_key). A long run fails once the token expires.
Useful pieces: Google credentials (Application Default Credentials or a service account) with token
refresh during a run, and the Vertex URL and body shape for Claude.
Additional context
Related: User Sim's opt-in replay of the assistant's own reasoning (NVIDIA-NeMo/UserSim#31) currently
covers OpenAI-compatible endpoints that return reasoning_content; this would extend it to OpenAI's own
reasoning models.
- I've reviewed existing issues and the documentation
- This is a design proposal, not a "please build this" request
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 2.3k
- フォーク
- 227
- 平均マージ
- 1日 7時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 57
環境構築
- Dockerfile・Docker Compose ファイルなし
- プルリクエストのテンプレートあり
- コントリビューションガイドを読む
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner のほかの issue
-
docs: required_columns description is incomplete for LLM and multimodal columns再び着手できるかも @nightcityblade が 7 日前に担当しましたが、オープン中のプルリクエストはありません。 オープンbug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner#1002 · コメント 3 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
enforce \from future import annotations` via ruff FA102 rule`対応中かも @chethanuk が 35 日前に担当しました。 オープンtask
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 82/100
NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner#760 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
bug triaged
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 45/100
NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner#1017 · コメント 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
Agent skills hide information in unspecified field再び着手できるかも このイシューのプルリクエストはマージされずにクローズされました。 オープンbug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 38/100
NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner#1010 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
Numeric sampler rounding can violate constraints and invalidate conditional sampling対応中かも @Avaivartika が 2 日前に担当しました。 オープンbug triaged
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 63/100
NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner#1001 · コメント 3 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
UKGovernmentBEIS/control-arena#917 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 82/100
debpalash/VoiceStudio#2937 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
aws-samples/sample-per-model-bedrock#261 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信