BL-11 follow-up: mainnet-grade randomness (VRF / multi-party commit-reveal) for dispute subgroup seed
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- 明確に書かれている
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- solidity
- 領域
- blockchain, security
調査の方向性
Read DINTaskCoordinator, _assignFreshSubgroup, and _shuffleAddressArray(address[], bytes32 seed), then inspect DisputeResolution.t.sol and the review on #151. Compare the VRF and multi-party commit-reveal options, including funding, timeouts, and anti-reroll incentives; coordinate with #156 on aggregation shuffles. Done means the seed resists bias by all named parties, missing randomness has a tested non-free-reroll outcome, existing tests pass, and NatSpec documents the trust model.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Context
Follow-up from #151, which is closed via PR #171 and tracked as BL-11 in Developer/BACK_LOG.md.
Since PR #171, DINTaskCoordinator seeds the dispute recomputation subgroup from a block in the future. openDispute sets seedBlock = block.number + disputeSeedDelay. After that block is mined, anyone can call lockDisputeSeed, which stores keccak256(blockhash(seedBlock), GI, tierKind, batchId). So the draw no longer depends on when the model owner calls resolveDispute.
What remains: on OP Stack, blockhash comes from the sequencer. A sequencer that wants a particular subgroup can grind the seed block. That's acceptable for DevNet/testnet, but not for mainnet.
What needs to change
Replace the source of randomness behind the dispute seed with one the sequencer can't bias. Options:
- VRF, e.g. Chainlink VRF v2.5 on OP. The seed is fulfilled by a callback, and
lockDisputeSeedbecomes a request/fulfil pair. Needs a subscription or funding model, plus handling for a VRF request that never gets fulfilled. - Multi-party commit-reveal with a slashable non-reveal penalty. This has no external dependency, but the penalty must make aborting at the last reveal cost more than the value of re-rolling. See the review on #151 for why a commit-reveal where only one party commits doesn't work.
The seed-in, subgroup-out interface should stay the same. _assignFreshSubgroup and _shuffleAddressArray(address[], bytes32 seed) already take an explicit seed, so only the way the seed is produced should change.
Scope notes
- Coordinate with #156. The aggregation-side shuffles (
autoCreateTier1AndTier2,DINTaskAuditor._shuffleAddressArray) will probably need the same mainnet-grade source. Ideally a single randomness provider serves both. - BL-11 residual (2): if nobody calls
lockDisputeSeedwithin about 256 blocks, the seed re-anchors and a second draw happens. Under VRF this goes away, but a VRF request that never gets fulfilled needs its own timeout and re-request path. - Not a DevNet 2.0 blocker. It must land before mainnet, or before dispute adjudication moves off the model owner, whichever comes first.
Acceptance criteria
- The dispute seed no longer depends on
blockhash, and its source can't be biased by the sequencer, the model owner, the challenger or the accused aggregators. - There is a defined, tested outcome for a seed that never arrives (a VRF request that isn't fulfilled, or a missed reveal), and it can't be used as a free re-roll.
- Existing
DisputeResolution.t.soltests still pass, including the timing-independence test. - A trust-model NatSpec note explains what the new source trusts.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 4
- フォーク
- 7
- 平均マージ
- 3日 58分
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 39
環境構築
このプロジェクトには開発コンテナ、Dockerfile、コントリビューションガイドがありません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet のほかの issue
-
dincli: `task model-owner register-request --manifestCID` fails because the registry contract isn't initialised対応中かも このイシューにリンクされたプルリクエストがオープン中、またはマージ済みです。 オープンbug good first issue
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 79/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#295 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
ROADMAP.md: refresh "What is still open for P3" (several items were fixed in October)対応中かも @umermjd11 が 1 日前に担当しました。 オープンdocumentation good first issue
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 74/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#285 · 担当者 1 名 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
good first issue help wanted
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#277 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#266 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
Approved documentation
難易度 1/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 82/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#248 · コメント 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
[oblt-aw][autodoc] Document obs-aw-automerge contract and fix automerge doc inconsistencies対応中かも @github-actions が今日担当しました。 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
admission-deferred priority: medium status: ready work-class: scoped
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#10887 · コメント 4 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
backend bug good first issue
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
PoCInnovation/Distribox#255 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
google/langextract#598 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信