Hacktoberfest 2026：メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

chore!: Automate data model generation from upcoming CycloneDX 2.0 modularized specification

オープン
  • 何か問題がありますか？
#955 コメント 3 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
初心者へのやさしさ
25/100
issue の種類
リファクタリング
明瞭さ
説明が足りない
活発さ
静か
技術スタック
python
領域
build-system, tooling

調査の方向性

schema/2.0/model にある CycloneDX 2.0 スキーマから始め、指定された生成ツールと proof-of-concept の作業を確認します。前処理、コード生成、後処理、コミット済みの出力が、プロジェクトの build または release プロセスにどのように組み込まれるかを定義します。Done には、決定論的なモデル、更新されたドキュメントと例、スキーマおよび enum のテスト、移行ガイドまたは文書化された移行上の制限が含まれます。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

breaking change chore enhancement schema 2.0
Description

Currently, the data models in this library are largely written and maintained manually. While this approach has worked so far, it is time-consuming and requires significant effort for both implementation and review. This effort could be better invested in feature development and bug fixing. (Also the issue is that the models code also implement the business logic, like property constraints, etc.)

With the upcoming CycloneDX 2.0 specification, a modularized and machine-readable format will be introduced. This presents an opportunity to rethink how data models are created and maintained in this project.

Reference (work in progress):

Problem
  • Data models are mostly handwritten and mix in the business logic
  • High maintenance overhead
  • Repetitive work for contributors
  • Slows down development velocity due to review effort
Proposal

Leverage the machine-readable specification planned for CycloneDX 2.0 to introduce static code generation for data models (not business logic).

This would involve:

  • Parsing the official CycloneDX specification (once available in machine-readable form)
  • Generating Python data models automatically
  • Integrating generation into the build or release process
  • Minimizing manual intervention for future spec updates

There have already been proof-of-concept implementations demonstrating that automated generation of data models from the specification is feasible. These approaches should be revisited, consolidated, and applied as part of this effort.

Pipeline:

flowchart TB
    A["Input: CycloneDX JSON Schema files"]
    B["Preprocessing (if needed)"]
    C["Code Generation"]
    D["Post-processing: formatting, code style, adjustments"]

    subgraph E["Result: Generated Python code"]
        direction LR
        E1["Data Models"]
        E2["Factories"]
        E3["Serialization-specific Normalizers"]
    end

    A --> B --> C --> D --> E

Philosophy: decouple logic fro mdata

  • Models are pure dumb typed data classes.
  • Factories implement business logic for instancing data classes with the propeties' constrinats defined in the schema
  • normalizers turn data classes into objects that can be handed over to serializers
  • serializers take prepared objects and render XML/JSON/PB

possible file layput in the distributable:

Core
  V1
  v2
    Models
      Cyclonedx
      Modules
        Common
   Normalizers
   Serializes
Possible Tools / Libraries

The following tools could be evaluated as part of this effort:

Community Input

Community discussions have already suggested evaluating tools such as:

and

These should be considered as primary candidates during evaluation.

see discussions:

Expected Benefits
  • Significant reduction in maintenance effort
  • Improved consistency across models
  • Faster adoption of new specification versions
  • More time available for feature development and bug fixing
Considerations / Open Questions
  • What format will the machine-readable spec be published in (e.g., JSON Schema, OpenAPI, etc.)?
    • JSON Schema it is
  • Should generated code be committed or generated at build time?
    • decision: generated before build time, and commited to the repo
  • How to handle custom logic or extensions on top of generated models?
  • Backward compatibility with CycloneDX 1.x
    • easy path: breaking change in the library, and only support 2.0 from then on
Additional Context

This proposal aligns with the direction of CycloneDX 2.0, which aims to make the specification more modular and tooling-friendly. Taking advantage of this early could significantly improve long-term maintainability of this library.

Note: This issue is intended as a meta-ticket to collect related sub-tasks and track overall implementation efforts.

Checklist

  • have the models created in a deterministic way from schema
  • generate the docs
  • have examples updated
  • have tests
    • test with all schema test cases
    • tests all enum completeness
  • write a transition guide in the docs
    • section "Upgrading to vXXX"
    • we might not be able to provide a proper guide at all, since basically everything is rewrite.
    • we might point to the github discussions - section FAQ - to pride at least some help
主要言語
Python
スター
117
フォーク
67
平均マージ
21時間 9分
マージ済み PR（30日）
3

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

CycloneDX/cyclonedx-python-lib のほかの issue

CycloneDX/cyclonedx-python-lib の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。