Interrupted image rollback can create repeated filename suffixes and stale references
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 45/100
調査の方向性
まず inc/media_offload.php の Optml_Media_Offload::rollback_and_update_images() と、そのファイル移動および添付ファイル更新のパスから始め、続いて acquire_transfer_lock() と move_single_image() を調査します。tests/test-media.php の関連するテスト、特に rollback と lock のセクションを実行します。Done では、中断された rollback または繰り返された rollback、既存の移動先ファイル、個別処理と一括処理の重複を、古い参照やサフィックスの繰り返しによる不一致なしにカバーする必要があります。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Summary
During transfer-back from Optimole Cloud, an interrupted or overlapping rollback can leave a restored image under a collision-derived filename. A later attempt can create another suffixed filename while the attachment or content still references an earlier name. The rollback is expected to restore one consistent local filename and keep WordPress references aligned. Instead, affected images return broken URLs on the front end, and repeated attempts can worsen the filename divergence.
Customer context
Product / area: Optimole Pro image storage transfer-back / rollback
Version: Optimole version unknown
Environment: WordPress 7.1; PHP 8.1.34
Integration / third party: Hosting filesystem and WordPress media sideload workflow
Reported error / symptom: A backed-up image had a .1.webp suffix; the current local copy has a .1-1.webp suffix while stored references use an earlier filename.
Impact: Front-end images are broken on a live business site.
Reproduction notes
Reported workflow:
- Transfer images between the WordPress site and Optimole Cloud.
- Run transfer-back or rollback, with at least one attempt apparently interrupted or repeated.
- Inspect an image whose earlier stored filename ends in
.1.webp. - Observe a local
.1-1.webpfile while WordPress or page content references an earlier filename. - Load the affected front-end content and observe a broken image.
The exact sequence was not independently reproduced. Missing details include the Optimole version, transfer logs, pre-existing destination files, and whether individual and bulk operations overlapped.
Diagnosis
Conclusion
The rollback path is non-transactional. It moves the downloaded file into uploads before updating the attachment’s stored path. If execution stops in that interval, the moved file remains while database references retain the prior name. A retry requests the same basename and can encounter the orphaned file, allowing another collision suffix. The customer’s observed .1-1.webp file plus stale references matches this reachable failure state. The exact source of the first .1 suffix was not established.
Where this likely occurs
- User-visible surface: Optimole
Image Storagetransfer-back / rollback. inc/media_offload.php—Optml_Media_Offload::rollback_and_update_images()lines 864–979 derives a basename from attachment metadata, downloads the cloud image, and passes that name towp_handle_sideload().inc/media_offload.php—Optml_Media_Offload::rollback_and_update_images()lines 960–1004 moves the file at line 961, then performs image processing before updating_wp_attached_fileat line 1004. Several early-return branches after the move do not remove the moved file.inc/media_offload.php—Optml_Media_Offload::acquire_transfer_lock()lines 1999–2016 uses separate transient read and write operations, so acquisition is not atomic under a concurrent race.inc/media_offload.php—Optml_Media_Offload::move_single_image()lines 2072–2105 invokes attachment processing without acquiring the bulk transfer lock, leaving an individual rollback able to overlap bulk processing.- Git history shows prior fixes in this subsystem, including rollback destination handling in
3e2d769dc57d1b29fb5e26cce4e8660ea1ae7413, attached-file updates ine725f747fe06dd8942fe7e7b08b0e1a1235b1d37, and duplicate-processing locks in thev4.2.11line. No history evidence identifies a verified regression boundary for this behavior.
Engineering notes
The inspected plugin relies on the WordPress sideload workflow for collision naming. WordPress core source was not present in the inspected workspace, so the precise suffix algorithm was not independently verified here. The customer’s filesystem evidence confirms that a collision-derived .1-1.webp file exists. The plugin path itself confirms that filesystem mutation precedes the final attached-file update and lacks rollback of that mutation on interruption. Bulk locking reduces sequential duplicate starts, but individual rollback bypasses that lock, and transient acquisition is a read-then-write operation. The affected Optimole version and rollback logs were unavailable, limiting attribution to one exact execution path.
Test coverage status
tests/test-media.php lines 348–358 cover a successful basic rollback. Lines 360–393 cover rollback-error retry eligibility. Lines 643–741 cover sequential lock acquisition, expiry, ownership, and duplicate scheduling. No relevant coverage was found during inspection for an existing destination filename, interruption after sideload, repeated rollback after partial filesystem mutation, actual concurrent acquisition, or individual-versus-bulk overlap.
What to verify or explore next
- May be worth reproducing rollback with the intended local basename already present and recording the returned sideload path plus attachment metadata.
- May be worth interrupting execution after the sideload move but before
update_attached_file(), then retrying the same attachment. - If reproducible, checking the targeted
tests/test-media.phpsuite across the customer’s installed version and currentv4.2.11may clarify version scope. - May be worth exercising simultaneous individual and bulk rollback for one attachment.
- If the original rollback logs become available through sanctioned diagnostics, checking timestamps around repeated processing of the same attachment may identify the observed trigger.
Unknowns / follow-up
- The customer’s installed Optimole version is unknown.
- The transcript did not include a REST API base, so the shared diagnostic token could not be used; rollback and offload logs were not retrieved.
- HelpScout returned no ticket images or attachments.
- The mechanism that first produced the
.1.webpname is unverified.
Confidence
Confidence: 88/100
Repository inspection confirms a non-transactional rollback sequence: the local file is moved before attachment metadata is updated, while interrupted attempts leave collision files in place for retries. This directly supports the reported suffix cascade and stale-reference state; the exact initial .1 naming source remains unverified.
Source: HelpScout #3436947600
Generated by bug-report-triage (ID: bug-report-triage_6a978341348899.48114182)
- 主要言語
- PHP
- スター
- 73
- フォーク
- 14
- 平均マージ
- 2日 13時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 16
環境構築
- Dockerfile または Docker Compose ファイルあり
- プルリクエストのテンプレートあり
- コントリビューションガイドを読む
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
Codeinwp/optimole-wp のほかの issue
-
bug-report bug-report-triage crash-report
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
Codeinwp/optimole-wp#1162 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
customer report feature-request-triage
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
Codeinwp/optimole-wp#1161 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
bug-report bug-report-triage customer report regression
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 56/100
Codeinwp/optimole-wp#1159 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
customer report feature-request-triage
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 55/100
Codeinwp/optimole-wp#1151 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
bug-report bug-report-triage crash-report
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 55/100
Codeinwp/optimole-wp#1139 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
Codeinwp/optimole-wp の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
sync-en
難易度 1/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信
-
P2 testing
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 90/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
1.severity: security
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
Automattic/static-site-importer#1879 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
bug Installation / Upgrade
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信