Selenium adapter captures no DOM on an Appium mobile-web session
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 48/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- android, typescript
- Ambito
- devtools, mobile-dev, testing-qa
Direzione di ricerca
Start at the Selenium adapter’s navigation hook and collector-missing re-injection path, then compare it with the Nightwatch mobile example referenced in #389. Reproduce with the Android emulator and Appium setup, checking whether collection begins before the test ends. Done means the Selenium archive contains trace.mutations and the replay pane and device frame show the page; trace.network is a separate concern.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
What happens
On an Appium mobile-web session (Chrome on Android), the Selenium adapter captures no DOM at all. The trace archive carries no trace.mutations, so the player's replay pane renders blank for every action and the live dashboard shows an empty device frame. Commands, console and assertions are captured normally, so the run looks healthy — only the page is missing.
The other three adapters capture DOM on the same session, so this is not a mobile-web limitation.
Measured
Same emulator, same page, same chromedriver, same run of each adapter's mobile example with DEVTOOLS_MOBILE=web, pointed at a static page served from the host:
| adapter | trace.mutations |
trace.network |
|---|---|---|
| WebdriverIO | present — 3 entries, 3 DOM anchors, 2 frame snapshots | 0 bytes |
| Nightwatch | present — 699,695 bytes | 0 bytes |
| Python | present — 234,023 bytes | 0 bytes |
| Selenium | absent — no such file | 0 bytes |
Environment: Appium 3.7.0, uiautomator2 7.6.1, emulator sdk_gphone64_arm64 Android 16 (API 36), Chrome 133.0.6943.137 on device, chromedriver 133.0.6943.141, selenium-webdriver 4.46.0.
Why
Appium's BiDi surface has no script module, so script.addPreloadScript cannot register and document-start injection is unavailable. Every adapter falls back to per-document <script> injection here — Nightwatch logs BiDi preload unavailable … WebDriver instance must support BiDi protocol, Selenium logs the same thing as Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'script'). So the failing preload is not the distinguishing factor.
What differs is how quickly each adapter's fallback becomes usable. Selenium's collector was ready after the run had finished:
11:30:07.875 test 1 starts (no collector)
11:30:09.523 test 1 ends (no "collector ready" line at all)
11:30:11.043 Collector missing on the current document, re-injecting
11:30:11.052 test 2 ends
11:30:11.516 ✓ Script injected and collector ready <- 464 ms after the last test
Nothing was ever drained, so no mutation stream was written. Nightwatch's injection and drain go over the raw WebDriver transport from the navigation hook and land inside the test; Selenium's re-injection is triggered by a "collector missing" detection on a later command and then waits on a readiness poll plus settle. On desktop Chrome the preload makes that path moot, which is why this only shows up against Appium.
Test length is not the cause: the Nightwatch and WebdriverIO web branches issue the same two commands and still capture.
Secondary: network is empty on mobile web for every adapter
trace.network is 0 bytes in all four runs. Appium serves no BiDi network events, and the Chrome perf-log fallback needs goog:loggingPrefs: { performance: 'ALL' }, which no mobile config sets. Worth deciding separately whether mobile web should request the capability or state the gap.
Reproducing
Needs an Android emulator, Appium with the uiautomator2 driver, and a chromedriver matching the device's Chrome (Appium's autodownload frequently has no matching build; pass the path via appium:chromedriverExecutable on the server, or CHROMEDRIVER_EXECUTABLE for the WebdriverIO example, which is the only one that reads it).
Serve any static page on the host, then run each adapter's mobile example in web mode against it and compare the archives. The mobile examples used here are the ones in #389.
Suggested direction
Not started, and the choice is open:
- make Selenium's fallback injection eager on navigation rather than reactive to a later "collector missing" detection, so it matches Nightwatch's behaviour; or
- have Selenium skip the BiDi attach for a session that advertises Appium, taking the fallback path deliberately from the start, the way the WebdriverIO mobile config does with
wdio:enforceWebDriverClassic.
The first is the real fix; the second is a narrower workaround that also removes the failed-preload warning and the jwproxy performance-capture error that the same sessions log.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 10
- Fork
- 2
- Merge medio
- 1g 9h
- PR unite (30g)
- 21
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di webdriverio/devtools
-
Document mobile capture in the README and on the devtools siteForse già presa @vishnuv688 l’ha presa 5 giorni fa. Aperta
webdriverio/devtools#385 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Cross-adapter conformance suite for capture invariantsForse di nuovo libera @vishnuv688 l’ha presa 46 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Apertacapture-architecture enhancement
webdriverio/devtools#300 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Generate contract types, not just scope namesForse di nuovo libera @vishnuv688 l’ha presa 46 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Apertacapture-architecture enhancement
webdriverio/devtools#299 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Spike: how to avoid re-implementing capture per languageForse di nuovo libera @vishnuv688 l’ha presa 46 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Apertacapture-architecture
webdriverio/devtools#298 · 3 commenti · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
PyPI release readiness for selenium-devtools-pyForse di nuovo libera @vishnuv688 l’ha presa 46 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Apertaselenium-devtools-py
webdriverio/devtools#294 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di webdriverio/devtools
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
melgarafael/DeskcommCRM#1812 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
prisma/prisma-cli#309 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
gregwebs/pi-quota-dispatcher#26 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
openwatersio/slackwater.xyz#124 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agent-reported area/browser area/docs documentation good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted P2
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni