Display Wave JSON regression reports with failure navigation
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 52/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- java, json
- Ambito
- developer-experience, testing
Direzione di ricerca
Start from the linked runners, Wave/tools/run_tests.py and Wave/tools/run_runtime_cases.py, and capture small success/failure/interruption reports to pin down the report versions and shapes you must parse. Then locate the WfP code that builds a test-results tree (coordinate with issue #34) and map pass/fail/skip/not-run/interrupted onto it, linking each case to source and diagnostics plus target/compiler provenance. Note the hard dependency on #91 before starting. Done looks like the captured fixtures rendering as a navigable tree, with tests covering malformed and large reports without UI stalls.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Problem / current evidence
The existing Wave runners can write JSON reports, but WfP has no test tree consuming them. A nonzero process code alone does not tell which cases failed, were skipped, or never ran.
Code and contract references
Scope / proposed contract
Map supported report versions/shapes into an IDE test-results tree with source/log navigation. Keep test discovery/execution in the runner adapter.
Completion criteria
- Represent pass/fail/skip/not-run/interrupted states from actual report semantics rather than treating absent cases as pass.
- Link each case to its source and relevant diagnostics/output when supplied.
- Record target, compiler identity and report provenance; label imported old reports clearly.
- Handle malformed, partial and large reports without freezing the UI.
- Test captured small success/failure/interruption reports from the supported runner contract.
Dependencies and boundaries
- Depends on #91.
- Reuse/coordinate with existing WfP work: #34.
- Ecosystem index: #49; existing foundations: #8.
Difficulty
Medium — requires understanding the affected tool or platform integration.
Audit baseline: Wave 509a1e46; Whale e3a12d08; Vex 71f29daa; WfP 2804fc02. This issue records source-audit findings and proposed work; no implementation or new execution is claimed. The checks above are future acceptance criteria. Prefer small fixtures and targeted validation; full builds or real debugger/IDE sessions should be explicit and necessary.
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 0
- Fork
- 3
- Merge medio
- 8h 8m
- PR unite (30g)
- 1
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di wavefnd/wave-for-platform
-
documentation good first issue help wanted priority medium
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
wavefnd/wave-for-platform#45 ·
-
documentation good first issue help wanted priority medium
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
wavefnd/wave-for-platform#44 ·
-
documentation good first issue help wanted priority high
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
wavefnd/wave-for-platform#43 ·
-
enhancement good first issue help wanted priority low ui
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
wavefnd/wave-for-platform#41 ·
-
enhancement good first issue help wanted priority medium product
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
wavefnd/wave-for-platform#40 ·
Tutte le issue di wavefnd/wave-for-platform
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
wultra/powerauth-tests#980 ·
-
account bug communication lecture
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
line/centraldogma#1397 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
cryptomator/hub#515 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
vert-x3/vertx-mail-client#268 ·